Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Shieldwall

  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member Cheetah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,085

    Default Shieldwall

    I miss the shieldwall ability that many sword units had in BI. I think that it would be a good special formation to make troops more resistent to cav charges (both for historical reasons -Hastings- and for reasons discussed in other threads) and in fact to any charges (for example vs two handed axe charges).

    Of course troops could move only very slowly in such formation (if at all). IMHO it would be more useful/better (and perhaps more historical) if most spears would have this special ability instead of schiltron (which function, as far as a I see, is never used anyway).

    I am thinking about mainly early era sword/axe units (norse swordsmen, dismounted huscarls, varangian guards, etc) and better trained spearmen (armoured spearmen, italian spearmen, etc)

    Comments?
    Lional of Cornwall
    proud member of the Round Table Knights
    ___________________________________
    Death before dishonour.

    "If you wish to weaken the enemy's sword, move first, fly in and cut!" - Ueshiba Morihei O-Sensei

  2. #2

    Default Re: Shieldwall

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheetah
    I miss the shieldwall ability that many sword units had in BI.
    I agree, they put it in BI so they could simply export it into M2. I don't see a reason not to have it. Its kinda a "well might as well..." kinda thing. However I'm not really too bothered.

    if most spears would have this special ability instead of schiltron (which function, as far as a I see, is never used anyway).
    Ye I've not seen it used too much. I'm surprised I've not seen any BI-Goth Spearmen schiltron type armies yet that were so often used in BI. However I did see a Hungary army very similiar that focused on HAs/Cav with just some pavise spearmen schriltrons to hold. Seemed to work ok

    Of course it depends what they want to do for an expansion. If they redo VI then I assume they'll be saving shield wall so they can add it as "an all new special ability".

  3. #3
    Rout Meister Member KyodaiSteeleye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Potton, near Sandy, the centre of the unknown universe
    Posts
    350

    Default Re: Shieldwall

    Hmm - this is where my historical knowledge fails me - were shield-walls used by armoured infantry after the 11th c? - i've always associated them with vikings/saxons period.
    KyodaiSpan, KyodaiSteeleye, PFJ_Span, Bohemund. Learn to recognise psychopaths

  4. #4
    Senior Member Senior Member Cheetah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,085

    Default Re: Shieldwall

    To be honest I don't know. In fact if someone asks me I can only mention Hastings as an example. However, since the game starts in the 11th century it could be justified to give some inf units shield wall ability.

    On the other hand, I am the first to admit that I had a gameplay point of view when I made this suggestion. This would give the inf player a tactical tool to decrease the horrendous losses of the cav charge.

    Also that fact that shieldwall tactics dissapeared after the 11th century nakes me wonder why? Was it because of the stronger archery or perhaps even because of the stronger cavalry?
    Does anyone have an idea about it? Does anyone know a battle in which the shieldwall was defeated by superior tactics? (other then Hastings, and even Hastings is arguable)
    Lional of Cornwall
    proud member of the Round Table Knights
    ___________________________________
    Death before dishonour.

    "If you wish to weaken the enemy's sword, move first, fly in and cut!" - Ueshiba Morihei O-Sensei

  5. #5

    Default Re: Shieldwall

    as a quick guess i would say shield wall was defeated by the lack of quality troops trained in the technique, after all the best infantry in europe up until swiss pikemen were actually dismounted knights. knights themselves wouldn't use this formation (knights honored single man combat, shield wall is a collective defensive formation, knights were single man and aggressive for the most part)

    while you might think why didn't some peasents or something come up with the idea at one time or another, the use of shield wall requires a paid standing army, thats because the equipment has to be fairly well uniform, at least the shields have to all pretty well be similar large shields, that means goverment issued shields, which means paid standing army, again knights were the paid standing army, infantry probably came with whatever they could find lying around, many possibly coming with leather armour and a spear and thats it, no shields at all.

    later on as knights put on more and more body armour, shields lost favour because for the most part there whole body was already shielded.

    thats my explanation for the lack of shield walls from a historical perspective.

    now from a gameplay perspective, this game is about REWRITING history.

    i'd actually like to see the ability to create custom units, or in single player to choose throughout the game the direction you'd like your faction to take, if you'd like to take swiss through the game as a pike nation thats fine, but it might be cool to say you'd like to focus on swords and infantry, and have the swiss armoured swordsmen be the finest infantry in the game you play :P

    well back to what actually has a chance of happening :P

    i found shield wall to be pretty well pointless anyways, its way to easy to flank anyways, so once someone won the calvary war they'd just hit you anyways, and if they didn't win the calvary war then they lost it and you don't have to worry about enemy calvary.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO