If supply lines are in, i'm out. If you've ever played company of heroes you'd understand why - adding supply lines to a rts does nothing but slow gameplay and drastically reduce tactical options.Napoleonic Era would be awesome but the game would have to be made much bigger campaign wise. The world should be chopped into sections and you can view each section on a different screen with each screen being like a M2 map. Europe, North America, South America, South Africa etc. Then, each of these maps would have to be bigger to allow more army-moving tactic. Maybe Attrition could make a real debut. If you don't stick to roads and camp in winter, you lose men. Armies taking supplies and supply lines could also be included with some clever thought.
Other things would be important as well. Things like More units under your control. More Soldiers on the field.. Larger battlefields. It should take a very long time to cross the field and you should be open to tactics like splitting you army into several groups to accomplish certain tasks.
I doubt all those things would be included if CA made a Napoleonic Total war but.. hey, I can dream right?
Again, if the series goes quasi fps i'm out. I agree with you on the setting though.Originally Posted by Tamur
Meh - wouldnt' be too bad but i'd prefer if it was kept out of asia so it was still relevantOriginally Posted by RtkBedivere
TW and gunpowder (that is, armies made up entirely of gunpowder) don't mix - not to mention that there was no place for group formations in ww2Originally Posted by Zain
NoOriginally Posted by GrimeReaper
Bookmarks