this text is also posted at stratcommandcenter forums, also by me:
"well hm this is just an idea, but wanted to hear other modders opinions on it.
well i decided to move this paragraph here for this is the most inportant in this topic the other things i write are just the causes i'd like to see a mod like this:
so the main thing is that i wouldn't really change the battle part, surely there'll be many mods that retexture reanimate aso models, but no this is mostly a campaign mod. the time frame would be smaller: the old medieval's 3 periods are really missing here and its just ridiculous as the years(only turns defaultly) goes.. so it would be a smaller period starting with 1080 as the default campaign (few years before the first crusade in 1092) and endig somewhere in the 13th century (last crusade 1270). in art history, the high time and slow recession of gothic art period is somewhere here and reneissance begins /trecento/ also 14th century brought a waste recession because of the plagues wars and anarchies.
the main modifications would be on the campaign map: every region would be split up into 3-5 smaller ones each of them would get smallest cities or forts (as landlords lived in stone tower which developed into bigger castles with time) and the player would be able to give these to one of his generals as a "feudum". maybe it would even add a diplomatical option instead of bribing a general (which is very expensive if not impossible most times) to offer him feudum in our own lands.this could model more realistically the medieval europe as there werent really ethnical borders that time. and on the holy land these smaller territories would be owned only by our general who took it, not by the faction he comes from. (still would give some boost in trade and wealth). and the king of jerusalem could be elected somewhat like the pope; the general with the most land and most "votes" from the smaller feudal lords /like the cardinals and the preferati in papal states/ would get the crown if a bloodline dies out.
well this is getting too long, so i end here, have some other thoughts in the theme still... if it would be too huge to make whole europe this way, i'd like to see a holy land mod with only its map, and these feudal things i wrote. so tell me if you like the idea, and i'd be happy to make it with a team. as i dont really know the modding itself, as i'm an artist, i thought of designing these new features, or just collecting historical data. if really needed i can make the map if someone helps me with how to edit happy.gif so that was all. thanks for your time happy.gif
so i love medieval 2. i was eager to play it and i started the campaign as soon as i managed to get my copy. alas i didn't have much time to play so after the HRE i unlocked other factions to play them.so i tried hungarians, but still something is missing for me. i mean something from game experience that i had with the first medieval as i recall. so it would be nice to have a more historically correct mod maybe? i mean they dont even use the old region names no pannonia wallachia dalmatia just budapest region aso.(anyway it is damn buda; it became budapest in 1896...)
so i feel like developers just wanted to create an enermous game mostly with the epic battles, but meanwhile lost the little things that makes the campaign cool. maybe its just me couse i studied (for fun) medieval times, -mostly the age of crusades- more than rome's history..
so its rather strange that in the age of feudalism my king (lord of life and death to say), cant really choose a guy to raise him a noble or a faction member... i just miss good old traits. its chaotic how the game offers generals to adopt and all and we dont even know where they are what they did aso. and other stuff is that first born boys took all the wealth of families and the rule in royal bloodlines. and i dint see even once in my campaigns that any guy rebelled against the heir starting a civil war.
what would be good to change is the crusades. all times the pope announced one, venice took its ships sailed there took the poorly protected jerusalem and the french danes whoever just got stuck in HRE or milan maybe even starting a war... i admit it could happen as a crusade even took constantinople for a few years estabilishing the "latin kingdom" as i recall. but still somehow it should be more cooperative, as all those wealthless people i mentioned tried to make a fortune on the holy land from all kingdoms.. so thats why i think it would be better not to let jerusalem under one factions rule. it was something like the USA for the immigrants in the 20th century.. maybe it was better if a new faction would emerge if a crusade takes jerusalem. (they truely had an own kingdom; the leader of the very first crusade became the first king of jerusalem.)
sry was long![]()
Bookmarks