Why to your "dismay". If they want to revamp it, let them get on with it. They're not exactly a "competitor" as such anyway.Originally Posted by Avlvs Libvrnivs Britannicvs Maximvs
I disagree. The .org does not need to chase around after another website trying to compete with it. This is not a game of "keeping up with the jones'" and this is not a forum for the under 10s.Originally Posted by Avlvs Libvrnivs Britannicvs Maximvs
It's a forum it's going to be unfriendly. The .com is unfriendly as well, but who cares. I don't post at either so they don't interest me. We're not going to lose our community to them, we'll simply offload all of the appalling little spammers and trolls that we don't want here anyway. If they go there for the "eye candy" and to mix with their peers, all the better for us over here. The .org is different to other forums because it's much more hospitable place.Originally Posted by Avlvs Libvrnivs Britannicvs Maximvs
There's one I do agree with. Let's sort out the modding forums and give the modders as much help as we can give them. Also it should be better organised and easier to find what you're looking for in there.Originally Posted by Avlvs Libvrnivs Britannicvs Maximvs
The .org will survive into 2007 and beyond that. If you're worried about the quiet spell don't be. Take a trip over to .com that's hardly buzzing either. A lot of members are busy playing M2TW, so that's why they're not on here posting about lances being held 2 degrees off, or <Unit Name> being a fantasy unit. Give it a few weeks and they'll be back.Originally Posted by Avlvs Libvrnivs Britannicvs Maximvs
Yes, a website revamp would be a good thing, but not for the reasons you've stated. It has to be revamped for a purpose not simply to outdo someone else's site.
Bookmarks