You should take a look at another John Keegan work on Waterloo, where he suggests the real reason why Napoleon used the column was simply because he was usually on the offensive and the column is the best suited for manuevering at speed across broken ground. That the revolutionary fervor of the French armies often overwhelmed less resolute opponents cannot be denied, but the column is hardly an ideal attacking formation in and of itself. More determined opposition like the British could simply shoot the head off the attacking columns.Originally Posted by katank
There, now this thread is completely off topic.
Bookmarks