I'm a little frustrated that, so often, what is supposed to be an easily-defendable position isn't proving so easy to defend. I mean, mostly, gates of settlements and bridges. Maybe I'm just doing it wrong but it seems like despite my being in a position like this, I need as big a defense force as I would in a regular open field battle.
Just lost a city to Mongols. Mongols had maybe 50% more troops than me but they were mostly horse archers, and the lightweight variety at that. What little infantry they had rammed the gate then all those horse archers rushed in and just demolished the 7 silver-sheild Italian Spear Militia I had schiltronned around at the gate. It wasn't even slightly close. I don't think that this same army, charging me on the open field, would have so overwhelmed me. But who knows - mongols are tough.
However, similar things have happened when defending against crummy militia from Catholic Factions. The attackers pack into the gate at black-hole like densities - so tight it looks like fur or a head of broccoli spray-painted black and tan and there's just nothing you can do about it.
Or is there? I considered defending the town square itself but I reckoned they'd rock me with arrows. Couldn't have gone worse, though.
Any suggestions?
Bookmarks