Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Performance of 0.8?

  1. #1
    Spawn of Nyarlathotep Member GeWee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    2nd Ring of the 7th Circle
    Posts
    122

    Default Performance of 0.8?

    I tried the first betas of EB but stopped playing because of the long loading times and bad framerate in battles. I'm at work right now so I can't test for myself but have these problems been adressed in this new version? Or rather, how's the performance compared to RTR?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    As far as I'm aware, they have not been. However, you probably need to test the game yourself, as they've had some reports of it being extremely slow. On my computer, the thing boots up faster than any adobe product. I run a rig similar to khelvans in this thread.

    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=74565

    I believe this little mod has been incorporated into the game, however it may be worth trying. I do not know its compatibility with .8.
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=59798

    This post was recently made, how do you compare?
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=75593

  3. #3
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    Mine works all fine and smooth (so long as I don't try something stupid, like top-level details plus anti-aliasing etc. on huge units - which is Lag City also with vanilla on my comp). There's probably some sort of memory leak issue inherent in RTW though, as playing long enough seems to result in gradual increase in loading times up to and including lag even on the cursor - although that takes something like six hours of straight playing.

    And my machine's not even particularly hot by today's standards.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  4. #4

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gazius
    As far as I'm aware, they have not been. However, you probably need to test the game yourself, as they've had some reports of it being extremely slow. On my computer, the thing boots up faster than any adobe product. I run a rig similar to khelvans in this thread.

    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=74565


    Well no wonder, whit Khelvans Equipment (or similar to it)
    A Friend has a similar thing and he runs MTW2 on high graphic, in the backround, downloads torents, runs ICQ and hears music from winamp

    I have a slower, damiged PC. (Should get a new one thil the end of this winter. )
    So i wait a while for plazing, and the campain map and actions lag a bit.
    Last edited by Ower; 12-22-2006 at 13:03.

  5. #5
    Member Member scourgeofrome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Location Unknown
    Posts
    187

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    EB is a little slow,thats no lie.But its all so worth it.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by scourgeofrome
    EB is a little slow,thats no lie.But its all so worth it.
    absolutly agreed

  7. #7

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    My loading times are fine, but I get terrible lag/framerate on the strategic map in areas with lots of trees (Germany and Gaul mostly).

  8. #8
    EB II Romani Consul Suffectus Member Zaknafien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Somewhere inside the Military-Industrial Complex
    Posts
    3,607

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    I dont know why people's games run slow unless theyre on year old computers or something.

    My game runs smooth as silk and Im always on highest, hugest settings, and even often alt-tab the game to windows to cut and paste screenies, surf the internet, etc.


    "urbani, seruate uxores: moechum caluom adducimus. / aurum in Gallia effutuisti, hic sumpsisti mutuum." --Suetonius, Life of Caesar

  9. #9

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    The biggest problem of EB is memory. You need 1GB RAM in order to play the game decently and even then, you better shut down every single other process running on the background. Only with 1.5GB RAM and a really good processor can EB without any problems.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Caveira
    The biggest problem of EB is memory. You need 1GB RAM in order to play the game decently and even then, you better shut down every single other process running on the background. Only with 1.5GB RAM and a really good processor can EB without any problems.
    I disagree, I ran EB .74 with just a 2ghz processor, 512 mbs of ram and 128 mb video memory. I played with low AA, and most of the single check marks enabled, on large, with most variable settings on high. Loaded a little slower, but the game ran fine, it also had no problems running RTR PE fine and overall was quite good. Then again, it really depends on what your after as far as running fine. If you need huge settings and full graphics to the max, if you don't have something very nice, it's going to be slow, but if you settle for medium graphic and maybe large settings then your load times will be comparatively fine.

    The only real change I've noticed between my old system and my upgrade was the fact that I can run a entire video production all in real time. I LOVE IT!! Boot up my myriad of audio editng programs, leave them open so if changes need to be made I can do so, then run Adobe After Effects, Premiere, and Photoshop all at once, again leaving those open and then do a Render with the Highest setting possible, which on the old system was one of the few things that would lag it off the earth, and watch other videos while waiting for the render to finish. Love it, love it, love it. I should get it all running and then open 3DSMax as well. However this is quite OT.

  11. #11

    Post Re: Performance of 0.8?

    Gah!!!!! Who cares about loading times when you get a good game play experience at the end. I cope fine on "speed" settings with unit scale set at "normal". Waits get longer as the game progresses.

    In other words: It takes a very long time to load, but it's worth it in the end. End your time with that RTR thing and come to the side of true gameplay and accuracy!
    Last edited by MSB; 12-22-2006 at 20:23.

  12. #12
    Member Member Kugutsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lausanne
    Posts
    287

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Caveira
    The biggest problem of EB is memory. You need 1GB RAM in order to play the game decently and even then, you better shut down every single other process running on the background. Only with 1.5GB RAM and a really good processor can EB without any problems.
    I second this. I used to have MAJOR lag and load/turn time problems, then I got myself some more RAM: result - no lag at all, and the load time is nice and fast:
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=74528

  13. #13

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    I forgot to say that altough EB needs a lot of memory, it is nowhere near as much for battle map as it is for campaign map! With a lack of memory, the game should stutter ALOT in the campaign map. I know this because in my grandpa's computer, which only has 512MB of RAM, could not play the campaign map decently, mine however, with 1GB, did. But, when one day the memory usage went above the 1024MB, the game suddenly started running horribly (in the campaign map of corse), so I minimized the game, shut down several processes like messenger, steam, etc, and game return back to normal. Might had been just a coincidence, but considering the evidence, I doubt very much.

  14. #14
    Member Member fatsweets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga
    Posts
    123

    Default Re: Performance of 0.8?

    One other thing you might want to do is turn shadows off on the campaign map and battles, that helps my computer run a lot quicker

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO