Nakamura-dono,
You wonder about how common firearms were in Sengoku-jidai. They became a tool of growing importance throughout the era, although as I recall they were not the backbone of any Sengoku army. Sengoku-jidai more or less ends about the same time of the Thirty Years' War in the Holy Roman Empire (Germany). Count Tilly stuck to the old 3:1 pikemen:musketeers used in the 1500's; something between 3:1 and 1:1 was the norm, while the Swedes were pushing a 1:2 to 1:4 ratio or more. My point is, even in contemporary Europe firearms were only the backbone of just one major army, which was still reliant on the pikes. So I doubt they would be any more utilized in Nippon.
The historical advantage to firearms, as I recall, is first and foremost their simplicity of operation. A "gonne" (the old term for gun, I use it as a catchall for muskets, teppo, etc. etc.) requires just the training of loading and firing. With a bow, the operation gets more complex--there's some bit of aiming in there. Yes, you can aim a gonne too, but it's not reliably accurate. So you need either a gonne capable of firing several shots at once, or several gonners firing at once.
The stronger the bow, the stronger the archer; if you need to deal with armored opponents, your archer is going to be a significantly trained soldier, and will need more than a diet of gruel. The bow itself is somewhat complex, and each one is something of a work of art--the bow is not a flaw-tolerant system. The gonne, on the other hand, lends itself more easily to mass production, and gains much less from training (other than discipline) compared to the bow. The gonne is more tolerant of flaws for two reasons: The operator is a replaceable peasant, and as long as the weapon makes a little ball go out the same end the operator is looking every time the operator makes it go "bang," then it's working.
As I understand it, you've described the origins of (some of) the yakuza. In Edo period, the samurai families of the Sengoku-jidai of course haven't stopped. And they haven't stopped having children either, of course! So between the peace and the natural growth of clans, there are a great number of samurai with really no purpose. Called kabuki-mono ("raving ones," some sources translate it as) or more properly hatamoto yakko ("servants of the hatamoto/shogun), some would dress wildly and use their position to justify extreme actions. Basically overpriviliged brats who never had to learn to control themselves. So, in some places, the local roughs and toughs (and plenty of drunks ;)) banded together calling themselves machi yakko ("servants of the town"), as a sort of vigilante/grassroots control on these nobles.Originally Posted by Nakamura Lobato
OK that much rememborizing hurt my brain. ;) Hope this helps give you a wider understanding of stuff. Oh, cool on Nakandakari about the potential bringing of a pottery style to Okinawa. As for stylistic changes to karate (ask about karate some other time), it's entirely believable. It has been said that if the master hasn't changed the martial art he practices, then he's not a master--just a talking book.
Bookmarks