Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Trait consideration

  1. #1

    Default Trait consideration

    I have a general who is abstemious (spelling?) and yet he is also a conessuir. While I suppose their not direct antitraits, it seems like one should bar the other.

  2. #2
    EB2 Baseless Conjecturer Member blacksnail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re: Trait consideration

    Abstemious of drink, or of consumption in general? A connoisseur of food, or food and drink in general?

    What do the descriptions say? If they conflict we may need to alter them.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Trait consideration

    Abstemious of even the smallest alcoholic pleasures, however he is a connoisseur of life's finest pleasures, value means nothing to him. He is also extravagent, spending wildy for whatever pleases him. I just don't see a guy who refrains from even a drop of drink also partaking of life's finest pleasures, price be damned. Technically there is no conflict, just kinda seems odd to me. I would expect the guy to more spartanesque.

  4. #4
    EB2 Baseless Conjecturer Member blacksnail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re: Trait consideration

    Actually, it's possible - look at Donald Trump. It's certainly safe to say he's a connoisseur, and he's definitely abstemious - he refuses to drink alcohol and thinks poorly of people who do.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO