Quote Originally Posted by Raziel17
Everybody knows that Nuzhet ed-Devlah can not be a Turk name.
I suspect you mean "every Turk knows that", not "everybody". I am afraid most Brits like me, and probably the Ozzie CA developers are totally unaware of it. Things like names of random fictional figures are probably very low on a game designer's priorities - conjuring up lists is probably something they give to the new kid who makes the coffee - and arguably rightly so. Should they have gone and looked for a Turkish medieval historian to check something like that? Seriously, if I were CA, I would use their limited time and money for other things.

The upside is that is probably very easy to correct by modding. And teams like EB have done a great job of getting historians to check out details like that, even with languages that are long dead.

I would focus your complaints on big things, not names or the derivations of them. A rose by any other name smells just as sweet. My question to Turkish players is more functional: does the M2TW Turkish army play in a reasonably authentic way? My, not very knowledgeable, impression is that seems about as historically accurate as most other factions (way better than the Russians, for example) and not too bad for a mainstream strategy game. I haven't picked up any major complaints on that angle in this thread so far. But, as I said before, we all have our own standards for what we can accept in terms of historical accuracy.

Aren't you reading messages or aren't you able to understand them. I am writing again, read carefully:
Comments like this are unnecessary - no bickering or hectoring, please.