I have just realised that I have made quiet an error in my long campaign as Russia. I am just over 100 years into it so I am not going to restart.
Basically the situation is as follows: My territory covers all regions up to (not including) Sarkel to the east and up to the Polish capital Krakaw (soory for the spelling) to the west. It is a vast area and I am at war with Denmark and Poland on the Western front and the Turks (who control Sarkel) on the Eastern front. I am allied with the Hungarians through marriage.
Anyway that is my current situation but the trouble is with my castle to city ratio. I have read that it should be 1 castle to 4 cities approximately and that castles should be strategically placed. I never realised this and have left the castles and cities as they were in the campaign map originally (I never converted them). Thus I have a large number of castles and cities (from memory the ratio would be close to 1 castle to 2 cities perhaps).
The dilemma is this. Most of the castles are ready to be upgraded to citadels and thus if I try and convert them to cities I will lose a lot of buildings. Currently I have no economic difficulties and I am able to get around 2,500 to 3,000 profit per turn which is enough for me at this moment. I am also planning to send some Merchants to Timbaktu to gain additional funds.
Do you guys recommend that I convert my castles back to cities and thus lose some buildings or should I just leave these as they are? I plan on invading Krakaw soon and then the nearby Danish provinces so should I just make most of them into cities?
What do you suggest?
Bookmarks