Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 32 of 32

Thread: Missile fire effectiveness question

  1. #31
    Typing from the Saddle Senior Member Doug-Thompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    2,455

    Default Re: Missile fire effectiveness question

    Top, so I can find it when I have time to make the post I want to make.
    "In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns."

  2. #32
    Typing from the Saddle Senior Member Doug-Thompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    2,455

    Default Re: Missile fire effectiveness question

    Getting some raking or crossfire makes all the difference in infantry battles, not angles and such.

    I spent a whole evening refighting the same fight between three armored sargents vs. 3 Saracen infantry, with three peasant archer units on each side. Green fields, average difficulty.

    I won all the battles except the ones where I tried something truly goofy. However, he only ones I won crushingly — causing 30 percent more casualties (excluding prisoners) than I suffered — where ones where some crossfire or raking fire was acheived.

    Even in defense, the only way to win decisively was to push out a "bulge," get around a flank or draw the other guy into a situation where he had arrows ripping down his line or where he had a unit that was put under fire from more than one direction.
    "In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns."

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO