Any comments, or discussion of the 4th Weekly blog should go here.
Any comments, or discussion of the 4th Weekly blog should go here.
Call me names, but I think a public decision for the final faction is selling out.
Not really. You see, when we were slowly ocmpiling our list we got to the last faction slot and we had a few candidates left over. We managed to discard a few but that still left us with three very good and very different candidates. Since any one of the three would be just as good and since each one brought its own unique benefits with it we really couldnt decide on which to choose. So we decided to give the deicision to the public and let majority rule on which of the three they think would be the best choice. Im sure when youre presented with the three factions youll find the decision just as difficult to make.
More information on this is currently scheduled for this sunday.
Yes, they all end up making the game much more challenging for the area of the map they're in, and very interesting (read difficult) to play as in the campaign. We can deal wiht any choice the pubic makes, however, taking "suggestions" like "Add Burgundy, Genoa, or Bohemia" is different. That would be selling out to public...commands.
"Half of your brain is that of a ten year old and the other half is that of a ten year old that chainsmokes and drinks his liver dead!" --Hagop Beegan
yeah I mean I always thought selling out, was when you made a profit and ignored the community? I.e., Counter Strike, DoD... uh, and other "Always Free" mods that you end up having to pay for.
I grant you permission to call us sell outs when CA buys us up.
Bookmarks