Now I have not seen any evidence of Beriut being anything else then a townie, going on the innocent until proven guilty. What is going on behind the PM and private discussions I don't have any information. Yes Kralizec two posts could be damning but I did not see the initial post before it was removed by Kralizec. The individuals who saw the post can drive the discussion around that, and a proper determination might be reached - or as noted above an investigation by a detective could determine the results. Frankly given the mistaken post by Kralizec, [b]Beirut[b]should be on the short list. Hince my abstain versus a vote on no lynch. Beirut's only defense is to point out that the game is one of misdirection. Which is valid, if not a complete answer to the questions posed by Kralizec's post. Does it warrent his lynching - I don't believe so, until futher information comes forward.

Now I attempted to arrange two protection groups last night on two seperate individuals. I am fairily sure that one was done, since I spent some time attempting to arrange it. Now in my efforts to arrange these protection groups did I stumble, and sent a message to someone that was playing both sides against the middle. Very possible, but I still don't have sufficcent proof to make any allegations against anyone that I PM for those missions. I suspect the hit was based upon the initial analysis of the message sent by Andres. At this stage I would like to take a look at all the PM's sent out by Andres to determine a pattern, but that is most likely an un-realistic expectation. But if I was a detective I would be investigation each name on that list, there is a valuable clue contained in that message that might lead us to one of the mafia members, or it could be just a red herring to strike confusion and wast the townie's time. Which at this stage of the game would indeed be a waste of the detective's time, which is why they should indeed wait until several more nights bring about other possiblities to cross-check. So to ignore the list would be incorrect, but it should not be used to determine innocence or guilt. Which means that my actions should be suspect until a determination by a detective or as demonstrated last night a successful murder on myself. Then my roll will actually be determined. Which is indeed a townie.

GH information is cloudly at best, and misdirection the most likely possiblity. I made a criticial mistake in sending GH the PM that describes my role as a townie, to demonstrated to him that my role is not a mafia one. This was before the posting that GH was indeed a Luca. Critical error - which is probably the most viable of the reasons why I was targeted last knight. One other individual has been given that PM, but I believe he is innocent of any attempt. Which places us back into the role of GH and his contacts. If I understand this game correctly the Luca knows who his Don is. Dead players can and do provide information that is useful to one side or another.

The short list of investigation should indeed be the list provided by GH which lists the possible mafia players.

Reenk Roink, Redleg, Beirut, Stig

Stig is deceased. That leaves three individuals to be investigated. If the detectives believe my claim of being a townie, or at minimul an individual determined for a townie, victory that leaves two to be investigated which is easily accomplished. Then the other names on GH post must be looked at also.

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=317

Quote Originally Posted by linked post
I told the following people this role: Kagemusha and Pannonian. I believe Kage may have told some others such as Caius Flaminius. Kagemusha claims the role of wiseguy. Pannonian claims townie.

and

Kage approached me in the chat about forming a townie kill group. The four of us were myself, him, Caius, and Sigurd. Our first target was to be Sasaki, but Kage called it off for the first night to wait and see what would happen.
So in his role as Luca and his attempt at misdirection GH has provided another set of valuable clues.