Quote Originally Posted by HughTower
Not really - it was the analysis of Andres' messages &, in particular the word 'maffia' that led to Krazilec's (correct) lynching. It was a mistake in posting by Krazilec that led to Beirut's lynching, which we'll find out the truth in time.

I suppose his reticence might still be considered suspicious, but in terms of investigative necessities, surely we can assume we've crippled one of the 3 families, & we need to try & focus on the other 2. They were certainly mighty active last night.
Fair point - however Andres was asked questions prior to the information coming out. In interest of following through Andres should be forthcoming with the information that was asked. Wether it is any use at this time remains to be seen.

However as noted in my first message, there are several issues that need to be resolved before the voting phase truely commences. I am frankly more interested in the discussions between The Stranger and luigi VI di Fatlington and the three way discussion between luigi VI di Fatlington, Pannonian and ByzantinePrince there is a clue available there I think. But I am not sure of what it is right now.