Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Can someone PLEASE spellcheck this for me.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Can someone PLEASE spellcheck this for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Stranger
    Can someone who masters the English language please spellcheck this for me before GMT+1 07:00 tomorrow? Thanks in advance.
    A quick run through, focusing mainly on grammer:
    I’ve chosen this book because I once saw a movie called the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, in which Jekyll and Hyde made an appearance. Ever since I’ve been fascinated by them. So when I found the book in our basement between other old books of my father, I was really excited. However, I never actually had the time to read it. So when I got this assignment I thought this was the proper time and reason to read it.

    My first reaction after I read the book was; “Poor Dr. Jekyll.” I really liked the story and it fascinated me till the last page. The writing style was slow but very descriptive and the story was well thought out and most characters were quite interesting. Throughout the story you are left with a lot of suspicions but you don’t get any confirmation until the last chapter, which is what keeps you reading till the bitter end. You get anxious to find out what happened to Dr. Jekyll and who his apprentice Mr. Hyde actually is. To be honest, I actually wanted to skip the entire middle part and dive straight into the revelation, but I resisted that wish and finished the entire book in proper order.

    The story is being told by Mr. Utterson, he is a lawyer and one of the oldest and best friends of Dr. Jekyll. At least, I believe he tells the story because the “adventures” are his and also the letters are addressed to him. The story is told in the 2nd person, but while he tells the story he isn’t the only central figure in it.

    The story is mostly about Mr. Utterson investigating the cause of the strange events and things surrounding his dear friend Dr. Jekyll and a repulsive young man called Mr. Hyde. Besides these three main characters there are a few less important figures playing their part in the story. One of them is Mr. Lanyon, who is perhaps Dr. Jekyll’s dearest and most certainly oldest friend. He helps Dr. Jekyll out by doing some strange groceries for him; the reward for his help is the “Truth” about Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Mr. Lanyon found the truth so disturbing that he refuses to see Dr. Jekyll anymore and considers their friendship at an end. Shortly after, he passes away. Mr. Poole only plays a relative small part in the story and is the butler of Dr. Jekyll. At the end of the story he helps Mr. Utterson break in into Dr Jekyll’s office. Mr. Enfield is a friend of Mr. Utterson but only shows himself in the very beginning of the story.

    There are only are only two round[-ed?] characters in the story; Mr. Utterson and Dr. Jekyll. The other characters only appear briefly although some do have an important role. During the story you get to learn Mr. Utterson quite well, you get to know how he looks like, how he sounds like and how he acts. You share his curiosity and eventually also his grief. You learn about his strong and weak points, his friends and his habits. He is probably the most all-round [well-rounded?] character in the story. Dr. Jekyll is a whole lot more vague, but that is how the writer has intended it. Throughout the story you do not get to learn about him as well as you learn Mr. Utterson but you do get enough insight in his life to sympathise with him, whether or not you understand his problems. Therefore I think of him as a round[-ed?] character. At the end, you know how he looks and what kind of man he is but most importantly you know the entire terrible history of the last two years of his life.
    Short Summary

    Through the curiosity of Utterson, a lawyer [repetetive?], we learn of the ugly and violent Mr Hyde and his odd connection to the respectable Dr Jekyll who pays out a cheque for Hyde’s despicable behaviour. A brutal murder follows. The dead man is one of Mr. Utterson’s clients, Sir Danvers Carew. The murder weapon was, unbelievably a cane Mr. Utterson had given to Jekyll. Because of this, the lawyer becomes entangled in the strange world of the Dr. Jekyll who, so it seems, has created a drug that separates his good and evil natures - purifying the doctor himself but with the dangerous side effect of changing into the monstrous Mr. Hyde. Dr. Jekyll believes he can control the drug and will only change when he wants to (that is when he takes the drug), however the more he uses the drug, the more control Dr. Jekyll looses and the more antidote he needs to change back. We follow Mr. Utterson as he investigates with Mr. Poole, Jekyll’s butler, the seeming contradictions in the doctor’s actions and his increasingly hermit-like existence in his laboratory. As the truth is about to surface, Dr. Jekyll passes away and Mr. Utterson finally opens the two letters[which ones?], which contain the entire truth told by his two best friends, may heaven rest their souls.

    My Opinion

    What I liked most about the book was the fact that your are caught up in it until the last letter. This is made possible because the story has been written in a very mysterious atmosphere[manner?]. You also sympathise with the faith of poor Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Utterson.
    The book is about good and evil and which man should choose. It is a problem we all encounter daily, and most of the times our conscience guides us. But what if you would discover a drug that would make your conscience unnecessary, you simply wouldn’t need one because you will not get blamed for your deeds [awkward wording of this sentence]. I think everybody sometimes dreams of having to power to do things (good and evil) without having to care about what would happen when you did it, what people would think of, of being unstoppable. The fact that it is such a human subject makes the story all the more attractive.

    (Here is supposed to be a piece of the actual story but I left that out for you.)

    That is the part I like most about the entire book, mainly because it is what you have been waiting for throughout the story, the part in which everything is being revealed. The weakest part of the story is the it is quite slow paced and that only covers a few incidents in the entire story, if had been somewhat faster it would have been an even more enjoyable read. But that is just a minor drawback, this is without a doubt one of the best books I’ve read, it is the kind of story I love, mysterious until the bitter end.
    I really recommend this book to everyone because it is one of those classical works about Good and Evil, it has gone down in literary history as one of the masterpieces of world history, and not without reason. It is that kind of books you must read but only you can make up your own mind about it because every person interprets it differently.
    Just a few changes that I've bolded and a couple suggestions.

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member naut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    9,103

    Default Re: Can someone PLEASE spellcheck this for me.

    Just some advice, it feels quite "wishy-washy"; try to be concise and curt while avoiding words such as "good", "better", and so on.

    EDIT: What is the question?
    Last edited by naut; 01-11-2007 at 04:36.
    #Hillary4prism

    BD:TW

    Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
    And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
    But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra

    Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts

  3. #3
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Can someone PLEASE spellcheck this for me.

    Hmmm thanks guys :D Well... my biggest problem with writing english for such assignments is the words allways seem to slip away... i always know the word but i just cant seem to find it on that time... so sometimes i wanted to use a cool/beautiful word... but couldnt get to it and used a lame replacement instead... that my explain why it is wishy-washy... though i donot know exactly what it means.

    thanx again

    We do not sow.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Senior Member naut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    9,103

    Default Re: Can someone PLEASE spellcheck this for me.

    "Wishy-washy" basically means it is not completely convincing, if you get my drift. You have to command the interest of the reader, etc.
    #Hillary4prism

    BD:TW

    Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
    And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
    But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra

    Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts

  5. #5
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Can someone PLEASE spellcheck this for me.

    hmmm yeah i know what you mean... but the assignment was totally stupid actually... some questions you had to answer and put in your story were really awkward... but thanx for the lessons ;) ill try to work on that in the future

    We do not sow.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO