no there doesnt, ive sat on an elephant's back myself, "bareback" as it were.
no there doesnt, ive sat on an elephant's back myself, "bareback" as it were.
"urbani, seruate uxores: moechum caluom adducimus. / aurum in Gallia effutuisti, hic sumpsisti mutuum." --Suetonius, Life of Caesar
unless you want to sing soprano however i wouldnt recommend going to fast hehe![]()
Skinner/Modeller for EB
heh. very true..and granted i was like 11 at the time.. hey maybe those chaps are eunuchs.
"urbani, seruate uxores: moechum caluom adducimus. / aurum in Gallia effutuisti, hic sumpsisti mutuum." --Suetonius, Life of Caesar
eunuchs![]()
![]()
![]()
Slightly offtopic (sorry):
I didn't found any picture of armoured elephant, however the fact they did exist was mentioned somewhere and that they had copper rings protecting their feet.
Could somebody, please, post their picture of non-Wikipedia source here (don't trust it too much)
Last edited by MiniMe; 01-20-2007 at 19:13.
1 Maccabees 43:Originally Posted by MiniMe
His assumption "that the king was upon it" was, of course, entirely unfounded, because Seleukid kings never rode elephants.And Eleazar, called Avaran, saw that one of the beasts was equipped with royal armor. It was taller than all the others, and he supposed that the king was upon it.
There is also a fragment of a metal figurine, the provenance and date of which I have never been able to find, though it is definitely Hellenistic, which shows an armoured elephant. This is what all reconstructions of armoured elephants are invariably based on. The metal hoops are based on some terracotta figurines showing a Seleukid elephant with a Galatian warrior in its trunk and which were made to commemorate the victory of Antiochus I in the "Elephant Battle." In fact, what are interpreted as metal leg defences may simply be the artist's interpretation of the folds in an elephant's skin, since similar hoops are modelled around the neck as well.
Well being Greek as fast east as the Baktrian or Indo-Greek kingdoms were during the hieght of said kingdoms meant you were of a fairly high class. We also know that greeks rode elephant so...
In fact the Baktrians wouldn't have had normal greek akontistai, they would have employed easterners in that role.
Last edited by QwertyMIDX; 01-21-2007 at 05:15.
History is for the future not the past. The dead don't read.
Operam et vitam do Europae Barbarorum.
History does not repeat itself. The historians repeat one another. - Max Beerbohm
The elephants of the Sucessor had armor. In the book of John Warry about ancient warfare he says that the Ptolemies used armor for their African elephants so that they could have a chance against the bigger Indian elephants used by the Seleucids at Raphia.
What I am not sure its about the mahout (the elephant rider) using armor. I have always read that the elephant panicked when he lost his riders, but I am not sure how easy elephants lost their riders. You understand me?
Without protection they could easy be killed by a well placed javaline or arrow, but illustrations I have found dont show them with much protection. I hope people dont get angry but if it is for me, while having so many elephants and factions that use them, I vote for having elephants without armored mahouts and some elephants with armoured mahouts.
http://members.tripod.com/joseph_ber.../hydaspes4.gif
http://www.hobbybunker.com/images/products/2025a1.jpg
http://www.ancientbattles.com/indian...dian_EL_01.jpg
As you see its also a matter of interpretation as in the illustrations above there are 2 Indian elephants with unarmored riders, but there is one illustration that has a rider with a linothorax and a Greek helmet.
Not necessarily. Some Greeks were higher class, but not all. Remember that many of the Greeks who ended up in Baktria were simply mercenaries, which meant that they would not have been particularly wealthy unless given land and made into katoikai.Originally Posted by QwertyMIDX
Probably for some, but again, many poor mercenaries ended up in Baktria, so it's not impossible that Greeks operated as lighter-armed soldiers.In fact the Baktrians wouldn't have had normal greek akontistai, they would have employed easterners in that role.
Bookmarks