Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 74

Thread: Rome Total Realism vs EB

  1. #1
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Which is the better mod and which should I get?

    Cuz I've heard the 2 have similar features, such as a new campaign map extending to India, and the new Egyptian-Pytolmic dynasty, and I've looked at the features. However, the RTR website doesn't give a detailed, indepth description of all the features.


    Does EB focus more on the barbarian tribes & other factions while RTR focus primarily on the Romans???




    Also, does Carthage get its legendary circular ports & huge naval fleet? (As it did historically)
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  2. #2
    Imperialist Brit Member Orb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,751

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    I haven't actually tried RTR, but from what I've heard about it, I don't think I will.

    EB has a beautiful and deep trait system, subtle interplay of nations and the Romans and Greeks receive as much attention as the barbarians.


    'My intelligence is not just insulted, it's looking for revenge with a gun and no mercy. ' - Frogbeastegg

    SERA NIMIS VITA EST CRASTINA VIVE HODIE

    The life of tomorrow is too late - live today!

  3. #3
    Come to daddy Member Geoffrey S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach
    Posts
    4,028

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    A loaded question, requiring thoughtful answers and mainly boiling down to personal preferences. At the moment, for me EB in its current state is the preferred mod. I'm looking forward to trying RTR 7.0 when it's released; the current release though is also a definite improval over vanilla Rome and certainly worth trying.

    Why not install both? It's a simple matter of copying your Rome folder, certainly so if you've got enough space. Both mods are definitely worthwhile.
    "The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr

  4. #4
    Member Member Kugutsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lausanne
    Posts
    287

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    If you have the HDD space, install both and see which you prefer!

    EB certainly does it for me. Incredible detail in all factions (not just barbarians), a unique traiting system that makes your family members into individuals, and generally an awsome gameplay experience all round. I can (and have) quite happily spend hours just reading the unit cards about the history and uses of the various units, which are an education in themselves.

    Im afraid I cant comment on RTR, having never felt the need to try it after finding EB, but Im sure someone will be able to tell you how they compare.

  5. #5
    EB annoying hornet Member bovi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    11,796

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Some people favor one, some the other. I've played both, and my choice is EB, but RTR has a lot of good in it too. Why not try them both, and decide for yourself?

    Having problems getting EB2 to run? Try these solutions.
    ================
    I do NOT answer PM requests for help with EB. Ask in a new help thread in the tech help forum.
    ================
    I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image. - Stephen Hawking

  6. #6
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Can those of you who have tried both RTR and EB tell me the difference between the two??? (significant differences)

    because I've read the description off of the EB website and this forum (and RTR site has no detailed description) and it doesn't really tell me much about either games.
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  7. #7
    EB Nitpicker Member oudysseos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    3,182

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    I haven't played RTR for quite some time: since 6.0 came out in fact, and I never installed the PLatinum edition, but two cents worth is that RTR is great until you try EB. Many of the elements will be familiar: The Egyptians changed to the Ptolemies and so on. RTR also has a Zone of Recruitment element for mercs; I don't remember how well developed its faction recruitment was but I am sure it's not as advanced as EB.
    What EB has much more of than RTR 6.0 is depth: RTR doesn't have all the units/buildings etc. in the correct native languages, or all of the faction specific wonders or really any of the role-play elements that EB has. Or the amazing latin, greek and celtic voice mods. It's an improvement over vanilla but doesn't go as far as EB. And the EB units are newer and prettier and as far as I can tell more historically accurate.
    What RTR has that EB does not is a whole constellation of minimods that allows you to customize your install. There's a great 4 turns per year mod, an interesting naval mod, a polytheism mod that I wish EB would incorporate, a metropolis mod: you can really make the game your own, giving you lots of options if you're interested in the nuts and bolts of modding.
    RTR 7.0 has posted some very interesting ideas that I'm keen to see the results of, especially their whole batch file/unlimited factions deal, but I am reserving judgement on it til it comes out as it might not work out quite so well in reality.

    To sum up, EB trumps RTR in most areas and is definitely more challenging and harder, so if you want an easy intro to RTW mods, try RTR first and then EB. The hardest mod of all, for gameplay, is Arthurian Total War. Fantastic mod, fiendishly difficult to succeed at.
    οἵη περ φύλλων γενεὴ τοίη δὲ καὶ ἀνδρῶν.
    Even as are the generations of leaves, such are the lives of men.
    Glaucus, son of Hippolochus, Illiad, 6.146



  8. #8
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    thanks for the info.

    Does anyone know which mod RTR or EB have the unqiue buildings?
    ie. Egyptian pyramids in Egpyt or massive Carthaginian circular docks?
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  9. #9
    Member Member Lovejoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    408

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Both are great mods.

    EB
    +Very historical
    +Good skins
    +TRAITS!
    +Deap!
    +Hard(er)
    -Runs slow
    -Still beta

    RTR
    +Tons of user mods, like imperator.
    +Multiplayer community
    +Some of the best skins ever.
    +Runs fast
    -Kinda easy

    And both have there ups and downs. Play and love em both! :D
    Last edited by Lovejoy; 01-15-2007 at 00:05.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    RTR is what RTW should have been.
    EB is the game that made me drop almost every other game. I might play a few others now and then, but I'm always back to EB. No other game can compare. RTR 7 may make a challenge, but as I see it:

    RTR is a one night stand, EB is a happy marriage.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    I'd honestly go with the whole "install and try both" idea, and decide for yourself. I mean, in some ways, you are comparing the two, and making them compete against one another. That's somewhat unfair. The guys at RTR have worked very hard to put out their mod, just like the guys at EB. Both mods deserve respect and appreciation. It is cheapening the work that the guys at RTR to say that EB is better.

    Nevertheless, if EB is better, then that is simply because the guys here have gone so far above and beyond that it is incredible. But comparing the two is suggesting that the two are in competition, and I don't see it as such.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    This isn't the place to be asking this question. It's like going to boston and asking if they like the Red Socks or Yankees more. But as someone who played both , I have to say EB is better. RTR is RTW on steroids. EB is RTR on radioactive super godly steroids of doom.




    Quote Originally Posted by Intranetusa
    thanks for the info.

    Does anyone know which mod RTR or EB have the unqiue buildings?
    ie. Egyptian pyramids in Egpyt or massive Carthaginian circular docks?
    IIRC RTR only has the normal wonders in it. And considering it seems every other town in EB has a unqiue building, EB does.
    I shouldn't have to live in a world where all the good points are horrible ones.

    Is he hurt? Everybody asks that. Nobody ever says, 'What a mess! I hope the doctor is not emotionally harmed by having to deal with it.'

  13. #13

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    I've always favored the old cake vs. pie comparison. But I'll admit in advance that I'm definitely a cake man myself, so I'm quite biased. They're both good, but by God, make mine cake!

  14. #14

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    I just installed EB this past weekend. I've been playing RTR. One thing i don't like about RTR, is that there isn't much variety in the Roman Legion. In Vanilla RTW, you had the Urban Cohort, Praterion Cohort, regular legionnaires, early legionnaires, and multiple cavalry, archer and artillery units. In RTR, you don't have Roman archer, so you have to hire Cretan Archers. There is also only two types of infantry after the Marius reform. You can train different types of units when you conquer other cities and installed the proper buildings so that kind of makes up for it, but it's not the same. Besides that, I love the game.

    EB seems(remember..i've only played it this weekend) to be a good game. I played about 8 hours of it. Still trying to figure things out like how to increase the generals command ratings. I've had one general tearing up the northern frontier, capturing about 4 cities in a 2 year span, defeated multiple armies on the field, and he only has 2 stars, and they been pretty evenly stacked and i have demolished the enemy. Some things that are cool is the deep traiting system, although i wish their command ability would increase faster especially if they have good intelligence, charisma and varility, and how you can install different types of government. Although, i do find EB pretty easy. Last time i've check, my win loss record is around 38 - 1, and i think that loss was a navel loss. And i'm playing on VH/H. One more thing that seems to be a problem, is that the game runs really slow, and my computer isn't that old. I have a 2.66 ghz pent 4 computer, 512 mb ram, and a new graphic card which i can't remember how fast it is right now.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    With a 2.66 Ghz pent 4, you should think about bumping up to a gig of RAM. You'll notice a really big difference in EB if you did do that. I've got a 1.3 Ghz Athlon and a gig of RAM running in it - my battles are slow, but only because I insist on having huge sized armies.

    As for command stars, what makes a bigger difference in battle are the morale bonuses. Check your general's traits out carefully and if he's really good and got lots of morale bonuses, or command stars for fighting in certain situations then you'll realize when and where are the best places to use him - on campaign or at home, defending or attacking, leading or accompanying, etc.

    Finally, I think most team members expect 0.81 to be more difficult because of the financial situation. Mines got a little out of hand with 0.80.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Being the Pessimist I am, I usually compare the problems between the two,

    EB
    -Slightly slower if you have a bad computer(and) insist on large or huge battles.
    -Traveling the Map can get a bit...Annoying if you're accustomed to traveling long distances with no rest(Migration)
    If you feel that you need to Migrate, turn off the scripts.
    -Harder(Bad or Good) In my opinion, good.
    -If an enemies treasurey goes into the red, they gain vast amounts of money(has some bad things, like with Eperios, because of their elephants, their money goes into the red by the 3rd turn and because of the money increase, they start steamrolling) In my opinion, this is good for a military challenge.
    -At its Current build certain factions don't ...Move..At all
    1-Lustonann
    2-Macedon(depends on Epeirotes and KH)
    3-Sweboz
    4-Sauromatae
    5-Saka
    6-Casse
    In the next build it will be fixed, and if you decide to play as those factions, its not much of a problem.

    RTR
    -Its mostly an enhanced RTW
    -No Scripts
    -A bit..Easy(Good..Or bad) My opinion, Bad
    -Trait system not complex
    -Some factions are weak and are destroyed easily(Illryia)
    -Some places on the map are much too crowded(Italy,Greece and Syria)
    -Not as Historically accurate as they claim.

    I prefer EB, my computer can take the game,the scripts are nice, Vibrant Faction colors, Historically Accurate and much more.
    [COLOR="Black"]Jesus's real name was Inuyasha Yashua!
    Any computer made after 1985 has the storage capacity to house an evil spirit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Fluvius Camillus View Post
    What I'm showing here is that it doesn't matter how well trained or brave you are, no one can resist an elephant charge in the rear

    ~Fluvius

  17. #17
    Son of a Star Member Bar Kochba's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    london UK
    Posts
    353

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    ask this question on the RTR fourms then compare notes
    "It is not so much that we need to be taken out of exile. It is that the exile must be taken out of us."- Lubavitcher Rebbe


    "Its a great mitzva to be happy always" Rebbe Nachman of Breslov

    We want moshiach now!!

  18. #18

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    I would have to say that RTR is how many people that play RTW got introduced to the game, and that EB is what is continuing their interest.
    Help make developers understand the importance of game AI and earn credits as a Game Designer. The Restaurant Game Project

  19. #19
    A pipe smoker Member MiniMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    453

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Quote Originally Posted by Teleklos Archelaou
    Mines got a little out of hand with 0.80.


    EB vs RTR is like Argiraspidae Torakitae vs Spartans =)

    The only reason to install RTR are their elephants skins and textures =)
    Since EB team has a lot of things to do and they are not going to reskin their elephants in the near future, I’ve modded EB for myself, importing RTR Indian armored elephants and their crews in it (took some time, not only you have to copy their skins in EB folder, but also adjust many files, I’m a bit proud of myself actually, never modding anything before )

    As for the rest… even if somehow RTR 7.0 is going to happen out of shining nowhere, the only reason I would install it is as a source of alternative skins and textures. And that's it.


  20. #20
    Member Member Thaatu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,117

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    EB requires more attention from the player, while RTR is lighter and more pleasing to the eye.

  21. #21

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Well you should play EB thats quite obvious.

    Concerning RTR thats an excellent mod too, but you shouldnt play it without minimods, which there are lots of:

    I suggest RTR AE (3.0 coming up "soon".) MetroNavalmod, ItalianInfantrymod, navigable rivers.
    TFT - Play as Pompeius, Caesar, Crassus or Verchingetorix
    77 BC Twilight of the republic (coming up "soon")
    Imperator II - Rome centred mod with pretty hard first years if you are up to a challenge

    All those are for PE 1.6 or 1.7.

  22. #22
    Crazy Russian Member iamphet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Москва
    Posts
    128

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    As other posters have noticed, there are a lot of mods for RTR. For completeness I'd recommend Extended Realism Mod for RTR. Together with Candearius' guide it adds role-playing flavour to the game.



  23. #23
    Member Member Shifty_GMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Buckeye Country
    Posts
    103

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    I played RTR Gold for several months before downloading EB .80. I would recommend downloading and playing RTR Gold first. Once you have completed a campaign then download and play EB. EB .81 will hopefully, (fingers crossed), be out shortly and is not save-game compatible with EB .80. RTR Gold is definately an EB light......but well worth playing. RTR 7.0 does look promising, but I read somewhere that it probably won't be released till Q2 of 2007.

    I have not played RTR:PE. So i can not recommend it one way or the other.



    EB Mini-Mods currently used in my Romani Campaign:
    Spoils of Victory for EB 1.1
    Force Diplomacy Minimod for EB

    MTW2 currently in use:
    BBB Titles Mod for MTW2

  24. #24
    EB Nitpicker Member oudysseos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    3,182

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Or rather than install all theos minimods to RTR, what with compatability issues and so on, you could just play EB. It's your one stop shop for gaming excellence.
    οἵη περ φύλλων γενεὴ τοίη δὲ καὶ ἀνδρῶν.
    Even as are the generations of leaves, such are the lives of men.
    Glaucus, son of Hippolochus, Illiad, 6.146



  25. #25
    Member Member Birka Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Sweden (Flen) (fairly near Birka)
    Posts
    356

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Well I havent played RTR for a very longtime. But from my experience with RTR I can only say this. What RTR did with the original Vanilla game, EB did with RTR.
    Cheers

  26. #26
    Member Member paullus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    always in places where its HOT
    Posts
    11,904

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    I'll add this:

    I get better battlefield framerates with RTR. But that's partly because I have the graphics options too high with EB because a lot of the units look soooo good.

    But I'd say it boils down especially to this:

    If you want to learn about the ancient world (its a lot of fun!) then EB is the way to go. It has more and better information, and not just in the military sector, than in many layman's ancient histories, and is better in some areas than quite a few scholarly works.

    And yet its tremendously fun to play...sweet.
    "The mere statement of fact, though it may excite our interest, is of no benefit to us, but when the knowledge of the cause is added, then the study of history becomes fruitful." -Polybios


  27. #27
    Crazy Russian Member iamphet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Москва
    Posts
    128

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Quote Originally Posted by oudysseos
    Or rather than install all theos minimods to RTR, what with compatability issues and so on, you could just play EB. It's your one stop shop for gaming excellence.
    Yes. With RTR you can select which features you want, with EB you must use them all.



  28. #28
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Comparing the feedback, I'm gonna try EB first.

    Is there any change to the difficulty setting on EB?
    ie. Does battle AI on H and battle AI pm VH still give unfair advantages to the AI like it did in vanilla RTW? And how much harder is the campaign AI?

    (I've read the interview of EB, it and wasn't very clear on this issue)


    Also, I have barbarian invasions. Will installing EB delete my BI saved games or make BI not work?
    Last edited by Intranetusa; 01-15-2007 at 18:54.
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  29. #29

    Post Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Hi there,
    Fortunately the AI on the battlefield in Europa Barbarorum is slightly superior to that of vanilla. It seems to manage it's forces much better due to EB's formations and it also now seems to try flanking moves much more frequently. It is not brilliantly improved, but it still is much more challenging.

    Sadly Hard or Very Hard on the battlefield still does give the AI insane bonuses. I think, however, that this problem is hardcoded. The best way to avoid this is to play battles on Medium or Easy. In Medium the AI gets no bonuses and neither do you, but on the contrary, in Easy you get bonuses and the AI gets penalties.

    Luckily EB does not effect your Barbarian invasion installation. All of your BI saves should survive your installation. Good luck and enjoy your campaign. Cheers.
    Last edited by Omanes Alexandrapolites; 01-15-2007 at 18:57.
    Dawn is nature's way of telling you to go back to bed

  30. #30
    Member Member ElectricEel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    175

    Default Re: Rome Total Realism vs EB

    Is there any change to the difficulty setting on EB?
    ie. Does battle AI on H and battle AI pm VH still give unfair advantages to the AI like it did in vanilla RTW? And how much harder is the campaign AI?
    The effects of difficulty levels aren't moddable, so no. I understand the recommended settings are Normal battle difficulty and Very Hard campaign map difficulty. The campaign should be more challenging than vanilla RTW.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO