Results 1 to 30 of 34

Thread: Democrat Goals: Government Control of Media

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Praefectus Fabrum Senior Member Anime BlackJack Champion, Flash Poker Champion, Word Up Champion, Shape Game Champion, Snake Shooter Champion, Fishwater Challenge Champion, Rocket Racer MX Champion, Jukebox Hero Champion, My House Is Bigger Than Your House Champion, Funky Pong Champion, Cutie Quake Champion, Fling The Cow Champion, Tiger Punch Champion, Virus Champion, Solitaire Champion, Worm Race Champion, Rope Walker Champion, Penguin Pass Champion, Skate Park Champion, Watch Out Champion, Lawn Pac Champion, Weapons Of Mass Destruction Champion, Skate Boarder Champion, Lane Bowling Champion, Bugz Champion, Makai Grand Prix 2 Champion, White Van Man Champion, Parachute Panic Champion, BlackJack Champion, Stans Ski Jumping Champion, Smaugs Treasure Champion, Sofa Longjump Champion Seamus Fermanagh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Latibulm mali regis in muris.
    Posts
    11,454

    Default Re: Democrat Goals: Government Control of Media

    The Fairness Doctrine was extant law when Reagan took office. It was on the books in one form or another since 1927 as part of the legislation for the Federal Radio Commission and the successor Federal Communication Commission of 1934. So yes, you may blame Republicans, but the chaps involved were Hoover (Commerce Secretary) and Coolidge (who did not run for another term and let Hoover take the fall for a depression he sorta knew was coming).

    Along with de-regulating more government than any administration in a LONG while and winning the Cold War, Reagan got rid of the "fairness" doctrine.

    Like many pieces of legislation, this one is mis-labeled. Fairness by this definition requires equal time to all major candidates on any controversial or political issue. The new version would seek to extend this "fairness" to all poltical-content broadcasts. So, stations would be forced to air 3 hours of somebody like Franken in order to keep the very lucrative Limbaugh program up and running. OR they would be forced to cancel Limbaugh.

    The intent -- an informed public -- is noble, but the means is impractical and functionally counterproductive to free expression.
    "The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman

    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken

  2. #2

    Default Re: Democrat Goals: Government Control of Media

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Fairness Doctrine was extant law when Reagan took office. It was on the books in one form or another since 1927 as part of the legislation for the Federal Radio Commission and the successor Federal Communication Commission of 1934.
    Yep and the vote was to get proper firm legislation enshrined due to the result of conflicting Supreme court rulings .

    Like many pieces of legislation, this one is mis-labeled. Fairness by this definition requires equal time to all major candidates on any controversial or political issue. The new version would seek to extend this "fairness" to all poltical-content broadcasts. So, stations would be forced to air 3 hours of somebody like Franken in order to keep the very lucrative Limbaugh program up and running. OR they would be forced to cancel Limbaugh.
    Yep a problem was that broadcasters found it too much time and effort to find enough type A moonbats to counter every type B moonbat .

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO