Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Weapons vs armor tactics

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #5
    Member Member geala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Hannover, Germany
    Posts
    465

    Default Re: Weapons vs armor tactics

    I'm sorry but there is no real way for lightly armed and armoured troops to deal with heavily armoured on the same terms. If you have to fight against a guy with a substantial mail armour backed with padding or a segmented or plate armour you will normally lose. By the way that was one of the reasons our forefathers wore such armour which was not very comfortable most of the times.

    Of course you can hack and slash and stab at unprotected areas or deliver heavy (and therefore slow!) blows against the plate. But be sure you have one, two or three aides at hand who hold the armoured man to hinder him to hack and slash and stab at your (greater) unprotected areas at the same time. Otherwise you can still succeed but chances are with the armoured man. If you have a big shield and a helmet the difference is smaller but still exists.

    Interesting discussions about arms and armour are found f.e. on http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/, http://www.myarmoury.com/talk/index.php or http://forums.swordforum.com/.
    Last edited by geala; 01-20-2007 at 11:24.
    The queen commands and we'll obey
    Over the Hills and far away.
    (perhaps from an English Traditional, about 1700 AD)

    Drum, Kinder, seid lustig und allesamt bereit:
    Auf, Ansbach-Dragoner! Auf, Ansbach-Bayreuth!
    (later chorus -containing a wrong regimental name for the Bayreuth-Dragoner (DR Nr. 5) - of the "Hohenfriedberger Marsch", reminiscense of a battle in 1745 AD, to the music perhaps of an earlier cuirassier march)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO