Strategy Maker Thread

[Stig]

Nice idea Pevergreen BUT I suggest a new thread for a new strategy.
Now I will post one, Elmo will reply. And then Barrett posts one, after which I reply to Elmo's reply on my strategy, after which Elmo replies to Barrett and me, and I again only to Elmo and Barrett only to Elmo, which makes sure things are becoming complicated

[ElmarkOFear]

Might be better to have everyone label the strategy either as a description (English Cav Rush Army) or by the player's name (Elmo's Routing Russian Army). Then there would be a reference. It would probably be good to have a thread for each army/strategy named. Or as Stig says, things might get a bit complicated as a single thread gets more and more added to it.

[RTKBarrett]

There should be a singular thread for each topic of discussion/strat... making it easy to find.

[pevergreen]

Agreed

[Darkarbiter]

I should also add
-How hard is it to do the strategy properly
-Bad points about strategy (easy to counter?)
-Good points about strategy (hard to counter?)