Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: IL-2 Sturmovik (and expansions)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Vermonter and Seperatist Member Uesugi Kenshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Mountains.
    Posts
    3,868

    Default IL-2 Sturmovik (and expansions)

    I've been playing a lot more of IL-2 and wanted to share tips, tactics, payload preferences, manuevers and whatnot with the rest of the propeller jockeys here in the Arena, yes Beirut that means you!

    My first question is what range do you set your guns/cannon to converge at?

    The default is 500m, but I set mine at 300m because the Flying Tigers did (and they did fairly well...) and because I usually have the most hits at very close range anyway.
    "A man's dying is more his survivor's affair than his own."
    C.S. Lewis

    "So many people tiptoe through life, so carefully, to arrive, safely, at death."
    Jermaine Evans

  2. #2
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: IL-2 Sturmovik (and expansions)

    Im by no means an ace, but I leave mine at the default. I've mainly been flying BF-109F4's lately, so the guns are all mounted very close to the center anyhow (nose & engine).
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  3. #3
    Tree Killer Senior Member Beirut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    8,168

    Default Re: IL-2 Sturmovik (and expansions)

    Mostly I leave them at default as well.

    Also depends on your target. If you're flying a lightly armed fighter against a heavy bomber, you might want a tighter pattern so you can pick out a specific area for maximum damage. Say you're flying the 109-F4, as Xiahou is, as you want to down a B29. You might want a tighter pattern and try to nail one engine or wing root on repeated passes.

    Try downing one of those huge Me-323 transports with nothing but machine guns. You might as well just spit at him. The only way is to repeatedly boom & zoom and keep nailing one engine or try to clip off part of a wing. A tighter pattern certainly will help.

    Xiahou, do you (also) fly the 109 F4 because it's the latest model 109 before the lousy cockpit art kick in on the? I don't understand why they did that. Even the newest 109 that came with the last patch had the lousy cockpit art, not the nice cockpits that the F4 and previous models have.
    Unto each good man a good dog

  4. #4
    Vermonter and Seperatist Member Uesugi Kenshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Mountains.
    Posts
    3,868

    Default Re: IL-2 Sturmovik (and expansions)

    I also find that for some reason my guns are almost never lined up at 500m out, but I get a decent amount of time on target at 300m, especially if I weave throughout a formation or slightly lower the throttle. I also spend a lot of time downing heavy American bombers and their escorts so that may be part of the reason that is actually useful.

    I also like slapping the big Mk 108 wing cannon on my my fighters so I think a tighter pattern makes the already devestating 30mm shell almost impossible to withstand because it will arrive in pairs right on the same spot, for example the engine nacelle. I've seen many wings fly off from just a hit or two up close.

    Either of you know the difference between the PC (?) and SC (?) bombs used by the Germans, I know what the AB's do, but those two seem identical to me.

    Beirut do you ever stay on a bomber's tail when attacking it? I've found that to be suicidal after a number of early attempts and now only boom and zoom. Any other strategies?
    "A man's dying is more his survivor's affair than his own."
    C.S. Lewis

    "So many people tiptoe through life, so carefully, to arrive, safely, at death."
    Jermaine Evans

  5. #5
    Tree Killer Senior Member Beirut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    8,168

    Default Re: IL-2 Sturmovik (and expansions)

    Not sure of the difference in the bomb loads.

    As you said, it's suicide to stay on a bomber's six. But there are a few other choices.

    Boom & Zoom. Come straight down on him from way up high. No defence for him. As I'm diving, I twist my plane to 90 degrees offset to his flightpath so that he comes into my gunsight from the side instead of underneath it. Gives you lots more time for a good line up.

    Turn and Burn. Fly a figure 8 racetrack pattern around him from the sides, always coming at him from his 10-11 o'clock and 1-2 o'clock positions. Little defence for him and it gives you the front of the nacelles, the wing roots, and the cockpit as targets on each pass. Have to have good speed to do this.

    Hit 'em in the belly. Fly underneath him by at least several hundred feet. When he's almost directly overhead, lift up your nose, blast him, then drop your nose again, build up some speed and set up another pass. This one gives him more of a chance to hit you with defensive fire but still works if your plane is slow or damaged.

    Head to head. Blast him in the cockpit while racing straight at him. Pull up at the last moment and do a great big loop with all that speed, then come right back down on him and blast him again on the pass.
    Unto each good man a good dog

  6. #6
    Member Member cunctator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Civitas Auderiensium, Germania Superior
    Posts
    2,077

    Default Re: IL-2 Sturmovik (and expansions)

    Quote Originally Posted by Uesugi Kenshin
    Either of you know the difference between the PC (?) and SC (?) bombs used by the Germans, I know what the AB's do, but those two seem identical to me.
    PC ~ Panzerbrechend Cylindrig = armour piercing bombs
    SC ~ Sprengbombe Cylindrig = general purpose bombs
    SD ~ Sprengbombe Dickwandig = semi armour piercing

    But I was unable to observe any significant difference in game, I usually always use SC bombs since they seem to have a slightly greater blast radius.

  7. #7
    Tree Killer Senior Member Beirut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    8,168

    Default Re: IL-2 Sturmovik (and expansions)

    Beauty. Thanks.

    I like the ABs, but a flight of FW-200s dropping 4x1000kg ABs each hits the FPS pretty hard. (At least at the settings I'm using.)
    Unto each good man a good dog

  8. #8
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: IL-2 Sturmovik (and expansions)

    Quote Originally Posted by Beirut
    Xiahou, do you (also) fly the 109 F4 because it's the latest model 109 before the lousy cockpit art kick in on the? I don't understand why they did that. Even the newest 109 that came with the last patch had the lousy cockpit art, not the nice cockpits that the F4 and previous models have.
    Well, Im still pretty noobish- my gunnery is still pretty awful (but getting better) and Im still refining my flight. It was basically chance that I settled on the 109 F4- it's what I was getting put in for career mode, plus it was the first 109 with those nice ammo gauges. So, I figured it might serve me to stick to one plane for the most part and to learn it well.

    My "zoom and boom" is still pretty pathetic since my aim is still lousy. I have a good bit of luck with head on attacks on bombers by throwing up some shots as they close and basically letting the bomber run into it- Ive gotten a number of apparent pilot kills that way, or you can knock off an engine or whatever.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO