Quote Originally Posted by Stig
Aye all true, but is it not so when a dead person posts much he spoils game.
Take Sasaki, I don't know how many "revealing" posts he has made as a corpse this night (and he spoiled the game a bit for Redleg I think), but I'm about 90% sure that he wouldn't have made them as a player. Now Sasaki might be the example, I don't know, but I think you can always find some players that want to revenge themselves and start revealing all sorts of things, things they otherwise wouldn't have said, so I think the rules should state:

Dead players:
-are allowed to post
-shouldn't spoil the game for others
-should stay in character, should act the same as they were doing before they were dead
A lot of those problems have been caused by people forwarding on whole PMs to each other as proof of their authenticity. Sasaki, as a well known player, recieved more than most. Redleg revealed his to me. It is the people in the game who turn them into a currency, and therefore run the risk of devaluing it in such a fashion. There are other ways of proving trust whilst minimising risk, as I found when I was recruiting people.

My point, I suppose, is this - a game is only ever for its players. If the players decide to do something, then the game should bear the consequences. For example, the use of Andres as a recruiter by Kralizec was inspired & ethical (if only he'd had a less distinct style), because Andres is well-known on the forum & acted as a NPC. Use of dual accounts like The_Don by TS, & later on in the game, The Messenger by ????, are clearly unethical, but were motivated by the Andres Gambit.

So as we make our beds, we must lie on them.