Interestingly, it appears we have a different attitude to drunken consent in the UK. At least the precedent in the linked case seems to suggest that. I was certainly always under the impression that as long as the girl wasn't unconscious, it's not rape, per se, in the eyes of the law.
I mean, even if drink drivers are utterly tanked, we hold them responsible for their actions, don't we?High Court judge Justice Roderick Evans directed the jury to reach a not guilty verdict, on the basis that drunken consent is still consent.
Bookmarks