
Originally Posted by
Seamus Fermanagh
Saddam was an effective dictator -- as this legacy proves.
He so effectively squelched anybody who even seemed to be a source of threat or resistance that few "leader types" are left. Nobody has the charisma/charm/power to take the lead and cross ethnic/ideological lines to establish a stable Iraq.
The largely Sunni government is trying to co-opt the militias and I am sure that the stated goal is to "pull the teeth" of the threat by making it part of the solution. May even be working to some extent. As the death squad thing shows, however, the strategy as a whole hasn't worked.
Like it or not, we are going to end up with (de facto if not de jure) a tripartite Iraq that is one country only for: sporting events & UN membership purposes. The interesting and unresolved question is just how much independence the Shia segment of the new Iraq will have from Iran's ayatollahs.
The USA is not willing to pay the price in blood, treasure, and bad press to truly subjugate Iraq and start over from a basis of relative stability. Since, given the size of the militias that would need to be suppressed and disarmed along with the insurgencies, you're talking about 1-1.5M coalition troops, the lack of political will isn't too surprising.
Bookmarks