What is really going on in Iraq?

[Spino]

More troops from the start would have definitely helped. 400 thousand is a far cry from ~130(?) thousand or so.

It's simple really, once the initial invasion of Iraq was over and the coalition assumed the role of regional policeman the movers and shakers behind the invasion refused to even recognize the notion that the conventional force which blew through Iraq's armed forces would be inadequate for such a role. They failed to take a page from the playbook of America's larger cities that have successfully tackled widespread crime (i.e. NYC). Basically more cops walking the beat in bad neighborhoods and engaging in aggressive policing means there will be fewer opportunities for criminals to do their dirty work unhindered (i.e. insurgents planting massive roadside IED ambushes in Iraq).

The Neo-Cons played this one like a 20th century Democrat tribute band and it has blown up in their faces (literally and figuratively). By following in the footsteps of the Truman and Johnson administrations and interfering with the generals' planning and execution of the invasion and occupation they have set themselves up for a nasty and bloody third act. It is foolish to say Iraq is a complete failure but I think it's safe to say our horse isn't going to finish first.