Now, I recall this was my first real RTS I played back then in those days. C&C1 was just so GOOD then, and very addicting. Or how about Red Alert, hm? Man, when I think back
So now the the time has come for us to discuss C&C3 soon to be released - a couple of months. Are you going to get it? Of course I'd have to assume there're many TW players out here who'd probably don't like RTS, but hey... a guy can like both turn-based strategy and RTS, right?
If I'm not mistaken, the main difference made to the series is that you now control infantry as squads 'stead of individually. This seems a lot better to me, 'cause at some point I got weary of having to select them seperately (though of course you'd just draw a box). Squad control's been done in games, most notably Company of Heroes comes to my mind, but when I look at those C&C3 clips it just looks ugly how they move.
What I don't like about C&C nowadays (and especially since Generals) is the fact that EA totally owns the business, and let's just say that EA isn't the most worthy publisher around (but who is anyway in this day and age?). I suspect C&C3 will be merely a "copy" of the same old fast-paced gameplay with minor improvements that are really worthy, graphics and such put aside. But who knows.
But you know - going back to Generals - I was very skeptical about Generals when I first heard of it, but when I actually played it I was amazed. I liked the game a lot, and it was funny and corny in a way. Those generals who uttered funny words when you were to fight them in a "personal battle"
So maybe my skepticism will prove to be faulty when I play this one. Well, till then I'll remain skeptical anyway
I'll probably get this game, even though I'm totally not used to RTS anymore. Have had trouble with Company of Heroes, heh heh, even.
http://www.gametrailers.com/gamepage.php?id=2613
http://pc.ign.com/objects/823/823989.html
Kane is alive.
Bookmarks