Fundamentalist immigration

**Hosakawa Tito** · 02-06-2007, 12:20

Originally Posted by Watchman

Eye for an eye ?

Yes, brown eye for brown eye.

I suspect that over zealousness and failure to follow training are to blame. That and a quack of a doctor. Never did trust doctors much.

**Gregoshi** · 02-06-2007, 17:30

Just when I sphinc-ter isn't any more puns to do, I find another.

**Banquo's Ghost** · 02-06-2007, 17:34

Originally Posted by Gregoshi

Just when I sphinc-ter isn't any more puns to do, I find another.

You have destroyed your audience with such audacity, Greg. No, I would go farther and say you have rect'um.

**Pannonian** · 02-07-2007, 13:48

Originally Posted by Hosakawa Tito

Yes, brown eye for brown eye.

I suspect that over zealousness and failure to follow training are to blame. That and a quack of a doctor. Never did trust doctors much.

What's the smiley doing with that string?

**BDC** · 02-07-2007, 16:14

Apparently our new UK biometric passports (which have to last 10 years) are only under warranty for 2 years.

So expect more immigration hell as they all start failing.

**Banquo's Ghost** · 02-07-2007, 17:21

Originally Posted by BDC

Apparently our new UK biometric passports (which have to last 10 years) are only under warranty for 2 years.

So expect more immigration hell as they all start failing.

OK, I give up.

Where's the pun?

**Gregoshi** · 02-07-2007, 20:13

What BDC is saying is that the warranty will cover (with no strings attached I presume) the new passports for only 2 of their 10 year lifespan, leaving either the passport holder or the government dangling with their butts in the air uncovered for the last 8 years.

**Banquo's Ghost** · 02-07-2007, 22:10

Originally Posted by Gregoshi

What BDC is saying is that the warranty will cover (with no strings attached I presume) the new passports for only 2 of their 10 year lifespan, leaving either the passport holder or the government dangling with their butts in the air uncovered for the last 8 years.

I imagine you have piles of evidence for that ass-ertion or are you stringing us along?