Mafia VI: Night of the Day of the Dawn of the Return of the Mafia [Concluded]

[GeneralHankerchief]

It's here! It's here! The latest installment in GeneralHankerchief's mafia series!!!

Basic summary:

- The location of this game is the Frontroom. The cozy Kingdom/Village of Peace and Love is under attack. Two of its members have joined up with the sinister mafia, and are now threatening to kill everyone in the town! It is the villagers' goal to stop them.

Rules:

- This is mafia at its most vanilla. Two mafiosi, one Detective. The mafia get to kill two people a night no matter how many of them are alive, and the Detective gets to investigate one person a night.

- Depending on the amount of people that sign up, I might up the number of mafiosi to three (but still keep two kills). This will be confirmed once the amount of players is known.

- The realism system I created in Mafia V is in place once again. Basically, the people with roles have more incentive to PM me quickly in the night phase.

- No screenshots. Of anything.

- Inactivity will be dealt with by the Wrath of God. However, I may decide to utilize Sasaki's replacement thread.

- Mafiosi cannot disclose their roles to anyone aside from me or their partner.

- The Detective cannot reveal when dead, and must reveal to everyone at once, in the thread.

I think that this will prevent the kind of mishaps that I, among others, was guilty of in Capo. Basically, I ask that everyone exercise their good judgement. Remember, this game is about having fun above all else. So play nice.

Post here to sign up. I'll be starting the game in a couple of days.

Good luck everyone!

Signed up: (35 so far)
Kagemusha
Sasaki Kojiro
discovery1
Xiahou
Stig
Fenring
Lord Motep of Kendermore
Sir Boo
Ichigo
Pannonian
Crazed Rabbit
HughTower
Redleg
Reenk Roink
JimBob
pevergreen
Ignoramus
CountArach
Rythmic
ByzantineKnight
Warluster
AndresTheCunning
Omanes Alexandrapolites the Idiot
sapi
Sigurd Fafnesbane
Sir Moody
Seamus Fermanagh
Dutch_guy
Caius Flaminius
Orb
UltraWar
Destroyer of Hope
Zalmoxis
ChuggtheSquirrel
Kommodus

[Kagemusha]

Ahh the classic is back!Let me just say that im in.

[Don Corleone]

In!

[Sasaki Kojiro]

In!

[discovery1]

In! #$~

[Xiahou]

Sure, why not? IN.

[Pannonian]

I'm wondering if I should PM the Chief of Police about this.

[GeneralHankerchief]

I'm wondering if I should PM the Chief of Police about this.

Then I would need to find a new one.

On another note, I'm glad there's such an interest. I'll probably do an information summary thread (again) if there are a ton of players.

[CountArach]

OMG! I am so in!

[naut]

IN!

Oh yeh In.

[ByzantineKnight]

In!!

[Andres]

Xiahou's reasoning sounds suspicious, but after Capo and Mafia V, I'm going to press Proletariat and Reenk Roink to leave a larger footprint on the game.

Vote: Proletariat

Hmmm... Proletariat isn't even playing

Seems like a poor attempt to prove your innocence.

Pannonian under hard pressure from the town: "But I can't be mafia. At the beginning of the game I didn't even know who was playing. If I were mafia, I would have checked the list of participants to make my choice for the first kill, wouldn't I? So I must be innocent."

Vote : Pannonian

[naut]

That is also true AndresTheCunning, but you seem to be protecting Xiahou. I'm not instigating anything, I'd just like to know why.

[naut]

PS: What you say is true though AndresTheCunning and Pannonian is also on my list of potential suspects.

[Andres]

but you seem to be protecting Xiahou.

Oh, but I am not protecting Xiahou. I am well aware that his vote for Destroyer of Hope had a strong smell of "meatballing", but the "clumsy" vote of Pannonian caught my eye. Pannonian is usually pretty clear and sharp in his arguments. This "silly mistake" just looks a bit too convenient to me.

That's why I go for Pannonian for now.

[Pannonian]

Oh, but I am not protecting Xiahou. I am well aware that his vote for Destroyer of Hope had a strong smell of "meatballing", but the "clumsy" vote of Pannonian caught my eye. Pannonian is usually pretty clear and sharp in his arguments. This "silly mistake" just looks a bit too convenient to me.

That's why I go for Pannonian for now.

Thanks for the compliment, but note I was the first to vote for AndrestheCunning in Capo, starting a bandwagon that only stopped when HughTower pointed out you weren't even playing. My arguments may sound pretty clear and sharp, but I really should check some of the details before voting.

[Sigurd]

I guess the game has started...

If I remember correctly in GH's games the kills might be written by the mafiosi or GH has tailored them based on a few instructions from the mafiosi.

The first kill caught my eye. An obvious frame of someone like CF (spanish reference). But I am thinking a young player since everyone old enough knows that Bulls are colourblind. It is not the red colour that catch the attention of the bull but the movements of the cape.
Or this could be a frame of the young players.

There is not much to go on here but the town's interest is not served by having a no-lynch this round.

Vote: pevergreen

A shameful bandwagon I know... but you are one of the young players.

[HughTower]

I guess the game has started...

The first kill caught my eye. An obvious frame of someone like CF (spanish reference). But I am thinking a young player since everyone old enough knows that Bulls are colourblind. It is not the red colour that catch the attention of the bull but the movements of the cape.
Or this could be a frame of the young players.

Vote: pevergreen

A shameful bandwagon I know... but you are one of the young players.

Truly awful, patronising logic, Sigurd. I don't know where to begin.

You are only excused if, by some strange quirk, you can demonstrate to me that this fact [bulls are colourblind etc] is taught as part of your national curriculum at a set point in your country, & therefore, you have assumed that it is the same in every other.

Poor argument, & a bandwagon to boot - stand up & be counted Suspect No 1.

Vote: Sigurd Fafnesbane

[Sigurd]

Truly awful, patronising logic, Sigurd. I don't know where to begin.

You are only excused if, by some strange quirk, you can demonstrate to me that this fact [bulls are colourblind etc] is taught as part of your national curriculum at a set point in your country, & therefore, you have assumed that it is the same in every other.

Poor argument, & a bandwagon to boot - stand up & be counted Suspect No 1.

Vote: Sigurd Fafnesbane

AHA!!!

So I hit home with my patronising... I guess you don't like being called stupid in public mafioso.
I guess the old ruse tactic still works.

unvote: pevergreen, vote: HughTower

[HughTower]

AHA!!!

unvote: pevergreen, vote: HughTower

The case against you snowballs:

1. Poor logic
2. Bandwagon
3. Retaliation vote

[Orb]

Vote: Sigurd

If I remember correctly GH writes up the kills based on what the mafioso sends to him.
It seems like a poor attempt to start a bandwagon.

[Andres]

I guess the game has started...

If I remember correctly in GH's games the kills might be written by the mafiosi or GH has tailored them based on a few instructions from the mafiosi.

The first kill caught my eye. An obvious frame of someone like CF (spanish reference). But I am thinking a young player since everyone old enough knows that Bulls are colourblind. It is not the red colour that catch the attention of the bull but the movements of the cape.
Or this could be a frame of the young players.

There is not much to go on here but the town's interest is not served by having a no-lynch this round.

Vote: pevergreen

A shameful bandwagon I know... but you are one of the young players.

Well, it doesn't seem a good reason for voting pevergreen, but still, voting somebody in first round serves the town's intrest statistically (correct me if I'm mistaken, I think it was Sasaki who calculated it in one of the mini mafia games). So I can follow the logic of the statement that a no-lynch is not in the towns intrest.

HughTower reacted pretty harsh. Sigurds reaction in turn was this:

AHA!!!

So I hit home with my patronising... I guess you don't like being called stupid in public mafioso.
I guess the old ruse tactic still works.

unvote: pevergreen, vote: HughTower

Sorry, but it seems a bit odd... "I guess you don't like being called stupid mafioso"... It seems to me HughTower was upset and suspected Sigurd of trying to start a bandwagon against pevergreen. The reason Sigurd gave for voting HughTower seems strange.

Call it a hunch. I've been in a lot of games, and his first-round behavior just feels a little mafioso-ish to me.

This smells like meatballing too. But at least you are not jumping on a bandwagon. I would like you to elaborate a bit though.

What caught my eyes earlier on in the game: pevergreen and Redleg trying to start a bandwagon against Sasaki, who is an asset for the town (unless he's mafia, which we cannot know for sure this early in the game). He opens discussion with his random accusations. Discussion we need at the beginning of the game. That would have been a better reason to vote pevergreen than the strange explanation Sigurd gave for his vote for pevergreen. Instead of defending himself against HughTower and giving a good explanation for his vote on pevergreen, he just switched to HughTower giving a no reason once again for his vote. Suspicious.

Pannonian voted for me in CDTC while I wasn't participating. Now he voted again for somebody who wasn't participating. Is he just being clumsy? I stated before that this can be a poor attempt to claim innocense later on in the game...

But Sigurd's behaviour seems more suspicious to me, so:

Unvote : Pannonian
Vote Sigurd Fafnesbarne

[Pannonian]

Hmmm... Proletariat isn't even playing

Seems like a poor attempt to prove your innocence.

A repeat of the Andres fiasco - I really should check the lsts before voting. Reenk it is then, for the same reason as before, and I'm sure he's playing.

Unvote
Vote: Reenk Roink