AHA!!!Originally Posted by HughTower
So I hit home with my patronising... I guess you don't like being called stupid in public mafioso.
I guess the old ruse tactic still works.
unvote: pevergreen, vote: HughTower
AHA!!!Originally Posted by HughTower
So I hit home with my patronising... I guess you don't like being called stupid in public mafioso.
I guess the old ruse tactic still works.
unvote: pevergreen, vote: HughTower
Status Emeritus
![]()
The case against you snowballs:Originally Posted by Sigurd Fafnesbane
- Poor logic
- Bandwagon
- Retaliation vote
Bah with your patronising and such.
I have to say, I didnt know they were colourblind, but I knew it wasnt because the flag was red.
Discussion has startedUnvote
I guess you are the grumpy old man here today.Originally Posted by HughTower
In what way is my logic poor? The assuption that only youngsters believe bulls sees red?
Maybe I overestimate the British school system that still teaches the dogma that Bulls actually can see the colour red.
I guess I should include all the UK players to my suspicious pool.
What is wrong with Bandwagoning? This is the only way to reduce the number of players and lynch a possible mafioso. If all voted differently there would be no lynch and absolutely no chance to catch a mafioso.
Bandwagon is a necessity.
My retaliation vote was because you got angry with my assumption which was a ruse BTW. Taunt the Mafia and they will answer.
You answered and seemed a little offended. Did I offend you? Did I patronise your well thought kill description?
My vote stands.
Status Emeritus
![]()
You're right, it is the only way to actually get someone lynched. However, the bitter taste in the mouth comes because people simply tend to follow one 'influential' player, trusting him fully and therefor not taking the evidence (if there even is any) into account. So yes, numerous votes are needed to lynch, but those votes don't have to necessarily come out of a bandwagon.Originally Posted by Sigurd
![]()
Last edited by Dutch_guy; 02-13-2007 at 13:46.
thanks pann
okay so we seem to be killing reenk here which is a bad move he is a good asset to the town not only because he tends to be a focus for discussion but hes also good as a mafia hunter
so to bring this to a draw i
unvote
vote Pevergreen
this is purely to create a draw
Last edited by Sir Moody; 02-13-2007 at 14:19.
Yes, that is the poor logic to which I was referring. It is also patronising. It is a common misconception that, in no way, is related to age.Originally Posted by Sigurd Fafnesbane
Now you have since stated that this patronising tone was deliberate:
Originally Posted by Sigurd Fafnesbane
My point of argument is that you are using your 'poor logic' as an a thinly veiled excuse to bandwagon. Bandwagonning is bad, because the easiest place for Mafia is hide is in the herd.Originally Posted by Sigurd Fafnesbane
So, in summary, I argue that it was a deliberate ruse you contrived so as to hop on the nearest bandwagon so the town would lynch one of their own.
You didn't offend me. I am not Mafia, nor am I young, nor did I write the kill.Originally Posted by Sigurd Fafnesbane
Your assumption/argument was 'truly awful', in terms of its logic & patronising nature. Again, because a retaliation vote is seen as unhelpful & scummy, you have contrived my percieved anger as being of an indignant mafioso (& frustrated author).
Now these are my arguments, I won't reiterate them (at length). If anyone else would like to add their own conclusions (fresh eyes etc), that would be much appreciated.
Last edited by HughTower; 02-13-2007 at 14:40.
I like Sigurd's attempt, it's the type of thing that will start some actual discussion. The colorblind thing is also taught, though I was taught at age 9 or so so I don't see the argument there.
That said, I still don't understand why people tend to look to the kill descriptions with the actual intent of finding the mafia responsible for them. Has it even worked, ever ?Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
![]()
Helped me identify Reenk. I don't think it's bad as a discussion starter. Used to be someone would mention something from the kills and everyone would jump on the wagon. Nowadays it just starts people talking.Originally Posted by Dutch_guy
I'm dead and it's only first round, those who killed me shall die for this.
Last edited by Omanes Alexandrapolites; 02-13-2007 at 19:46.
Dawn is nature's way of telling you to go back to bed
Vote: Sigurd
If I remember correctly GH writes up the kills based on what the mafioso sends to him.
It seems like a poor attempt to start a bandwagon.
Last edited by Orb; 02-13-2007 at 12:35.
'My intelligence is not just insulted, it's looking for revenge with a gun and no mercy. ' - Frogbeastegg
SERA NIMIS VITA EST CRASTINA VIVE HODIE
The life of tomorrow is too late - live today!
all i can say is this entire round has me utterly confused ... can no-one keep their vote for more than 3 posts? can someone put up a tally so i can see where the winds are going because im utterly lost as it is
Vote Abstain
until i can see which way the wind is blowing
Tally as of post #114
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Bookmarks