Mafia VI: Night of the Day of the Dawn of the Return of the Mafia [Concluded]

**Csargo** · 02-22-2007, 03:35

Originally Posted by Reenk Roink

Why do you keep trying to baiting me? In this thread and the "Regarding Atheism" one.

I stated a theory why you have voted for me. All you have been able to do (except make fat jokes) is call me "arrogant". In the "Regarding Atheism" thread, I stated that your gave examples of potential infinites instead of actual infinites. You called me "condescending"...

These were not my intentions, and your perceptions are not my responsibility.

I did not call you condescending or arrogant when you said there was something wrong with my question...

Really, you gotta just get over it now...

hehehe

**ChuggtheSquirrel** · 02-22-2007, 04:09

Don't know who to vote for... Who should I vote for?

**HughTower** · 02-22-2007, 10:32

Originally Posted by ChuggtheSquirrel

Don't know who to vote for... Who should I vote for?

So, there have been 547 posts devoted to the topic of who should we lynch, there's been well reasoned arguments, pedantic semantic debate, insults, tantrums, tears, laughter, & the whole pantechnicon of human emotion, yet, still,

You don't know for whom to vote?

In summary (& I'll try & keep this as objective as possible, despite having expressed my arguments on the matter at some length) then, the two bandwagons are on:

Xiahou - for posting out of character to previous games. This has been denied vigorously by the defendant, whose robust defense has led others to vote for him ......for defending robustly. He has since given up defending himself, voted to lynch himself as the only way left to prove his innocence (he feels) & help the town move on in its inquiries is through his death. He left this vote on till the end, even though by lifting it he could have secured his safety & lynch Sigurd. This last tactic saw an uplift in his fortunes with a few crucial votes swinging away from him & onto others.

Sigurd - for bandwagonning, poor reasoning (if any), & hindering the town in its investigations. He has done little to defend himself at any point, claims he has no time at the moment (yet enough to read the thread & vote & mod another game), took his vote off Xiahou in the last round to force a tie (allegedly) but then put it back on when it looked like he himself would be lynched. In contrast to Xiahou, it appears that this behaviour will prove to be his downfall.

**pevergreen** · 02-22-2007, 10:47

Id like to make a note. Voting for oneself is:
1. A mafia tactic
2. a new player feeling s/he is out of their depth, thinking it would help.

Either way, getting rid of that person is good for the town.
I have convinced myself, and shown my arguments.

I do not give up what i believe in easily, and have stated that my votes in this game will not come unless there is a very good reason.

Vote: Xiahou

**Csargo** · 02-22-2007, 20:50

Originally Posted by HughTower

So, there have been 547 posts devoted to the topic of who should we lynch, there's been well reasoned arguments, pedantic semantic debate, insults, tantrums, tears, laughter, & the whole pantechnicon of human emotion, yet, still,

You don't know for whom to vote?

In summary (& I'll try & keep this as objective as possible, despite having expressed my arguments on the matter at some length) then, the two bandwagons are on:

Xiahou - for posting out of character to previous games. This has been denied vigorously by the defendant, whose robust defense has led others to vote for him ......for defending robustly. He has since given up defending himself, voted to lynch himself as the only way left to prove his innocence (he feels) & help the town move on in its inquiries is through his death. He left this vote on till the end, even though by lifting it he could have secured his safety & lynch Sigurd. This last tactic saw an uplift in his fortunes with a few crucial votes swinging away from him & onto others.

Sigurd - for bandwagonning, poor reasoning (if any), & hindering the town in its investigations. He has done little to defend himself at any point, claims he has no time at the moment (yet enough to read the thread & vote & mod another game), took his vote off Xiahou in the last round to force a tie (allegedly) but then put it back on when it looked like he himself would be lynched. In contrast to Xiahou, it appears that this behaviour will prove to be his downfall.

That's a very one sided summary.

**Stig** · 02-22-2007, 20:54

Hughtower supports Xiahou as it seems, that means this is a good lynch.

**ChuggtheSquirrel** · 02-23-2007, 04:14

Originally Posted by HughTower

So, there have been 547 posts devoted to the topic of who should we lynch, there's been well reasoned arguments, pedantic semantic debate, insults, tantrums, tears, laughter, & the whole pantechnicon of human emotion, yet, still,

You don't know for whom to vote?

In summary (& I'll try & keep this as objective as possible, despite having expressed my arguments on the matter at some length) then, the two bandwagons are on:

Xiahou - for posting out of character to previous games. This has been denied vigorously by the defendant, whose robust defense has led others to vote for him ......for defending robustly. He has since given up defending himself, voted to lynch himself as the only way left to prove his innocence (he feels) & help the town move on in its inquiries is through his death. He left this vote on till the end, even though by lifting it he could have secured his safety & lynch Sigurd. This last tactic saw an uplift in his fortunes with a few crucial votes swinging away from him & onto others.

Sigurd - for bandwagonning, poor reasoning (if any), & hindering the town in its investigations. He has done little to defend himself at any point, claims he has no time at the moment (yet enough to read the thread & vote & mod another game), took his vote off Xiahou in the last round to force a tie (allegedly) but then put it back on when it looked like he himself would be lynched. In contrast to Xiahou, it appears that this behaviour will prove to be his downfall.

Sorry. I'm not very good at seeing the arguments in non-mini mafia games.

I was going to vote Sigurd, cause of the reasoning, but seeing as Xiahou's dead already...

Edit: I liked the write-up. Nice job with the WoG. lol

**pevergreen** · 02-23-2007, 05:13

Im just failing to see how three seperate vote counts can miss me?

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=556

**Sasaki Kojiro** · 02-23-2007, 05:27

Originally Posted by pevergreen

Im just failing to see how three seperate vote counts can miss me?

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=556

There's no vote in that post

**pevergreen** · 02-23-2007, 05:46

edited out

Not its not suspicious, look at the discussion down below

**HughTower** · 02-23-2007, 11:24

Originally Posted by Xiahou

That doesn't really make any sense- we [Hughtower & Xiahou] can't both be mafia. Out of the two of us, at least 1 and possibly both are innocent.

To which Stig replied,

Originally Posted by Stig

And why is that?

In answer to his question,

Originally Posted by GH's first post

Rules:

- This is mafia at its most vanilla. Two mafiosi, one Detective. The mafia get to kill two people a night no matter how many of them are alive, and the Detective gets to investigate one person a night.

And to use his own words,

Originally Posted by Stig's signature

I'm not intending to imply insult or judgment here but I am curious to know in order to be able to respond to your posts in an appropriate manner, so please forgive what appears to be, but in fact is not intended as, an insulting question: Are you stupid? - Helm

Originally Posted by ChuggtheSquirrel

Sorry. I'm not very good at seeing the arguments in non-mini mafia games.

Don't be embarassed or sorry, I was shouting for effect more than anything. My point really is that your involvement in discussion(as a townie) is crucial, even if you just summarise what others have said. It doesn't have to be right, it just has to present a PoV.