Mafia VI: Night of the Day of the Dawn of the Return of the Mafia [Concluded]

[Andres]

Not again

Only a few games to compare. In Capo, average post length was 722 characters, average interval was 648 minutes, average delay was 1048 minutes. In Midgard Saga, average post length was 569 characters, average interval was 321 minutes, average delay was 533 minutes. Current activity level much closer to Capo, with an average post length of 937 characters, an average interval of 994 minutes, and an average delay of 1084 minutes. Activity suggests less frequent but more well-thought-out posts. Very likely to have a role.

So, you only have two games to compare to. Not very much to go on, eh? I post less frequent indeed. On purpose. Why? Because I hated the high amount of posts in the last two big mafia games. I am well aware I was one of the causes of that. So I try to post less. Add to that I have been absent several times, like I stated before. So, less opportunities to log in and post. That's another reason why I have less posts, but with more text. Check the Midgard Saga: I got lynched without posting once to defend myself because of real life.

And now I get this? Making well thought posts makes one look more suspicious ? Would you prefer me to make some short, rubbish posts, where I vote for someone without giving any good reason? That would make me look less guilty?

Sorry Kommodus. This just seems very weird. I don't believe in your system. You deceived it once yourself + if I understood one of Seamus last posts correctly, it also failed at least once in a previous game. Whether you are guilty yourself or, without realising it, you are offering the mafia a nice opportunity to get a townie lynched, hiding behind your system.

Well, there are no role pm's in this game, so I can only question your system, point out the dangers of it and declare that I am innocent. Check the thread. I've made well thought posts (but apparently, that seems to be suspicious ), trying to detect who acts suspicious and voting accordingly. I am not the detective, so there's not much to reveal to 'prove' my innocence.

Now, for instance, I don't like how CA voted. He accepts the system without critisizing or asking questons, putting a third vote on an innocent townie:

I'll go with Kommodus on this one as well. He seems to know what he is doing.

Just popping up and voting for someone who is likely to get lynched, not giving any good reasons of his own Ah, but I see, he didn't make a well thought post. So he must be innocent !

But for now, I'll stick to my vote for Sasaki however, since I want him to talk in the thread. I want useful townies to participate.