Results 1 to 30 of 45

Thread: Is Milan to Strong?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Praeparet bellum Member Quillan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,109

    Default Re: Is Milan to Strong?

    From a pure trading standpoint, I think Genoa is one of the most valuable cities in the game. It generates income like Athens or Sparta did in RTW, primarily because it has easy trade links with Florence, Rome, Ajaccio, Cagliari, and Palermo. In my Venetian campaign, it made more money per turn than Venice did. The Aegean Sea isn't the gold mine it was in RTW; the reduction in the number of provinces over there reduced the trade value significantly. Venice can trade with Ragusa (castle), Durazzo (tiny) or Naples, of the nearby cities, and Naples is the only one that generates significant value. Bologna is too close to trade, I'm pretty sure.

    Combine high money with cheap troops and Milan can produce larger armies than most factions in the early going. Venice is scattered, while Milan is compact. This gives them an edge. Milan usually winds up taking Dijon, in my experience, and almost always winds up with Florence no matter who gets it first.
    Age and treachery will defeat youth and skill every time.

  2. #2
    Member Member Skyline Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    27

    Default Re: Is Milan to Strong?

    Could that be because the others have obtained their scripted target cities?
    There are no 'target' cities other than those stated in the objectives. I've modified my short campaigns to include specific city objectives and the AI seems to follow it to a degree.

    For example I gave the Byzantines a bunch of specific cities to capture and they went about doing exactly that.

  3. #3
    Member Member Bobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    South Caribbean
    Posts
    39

    Default Re: Is Milan to Strong?

    Quote Originally Posted by Skyline Pete
    There are no 'target' cities other than those stated in the objectives. I've modified my short campaigns to include specific city objectives and the AI seems to follow it to a degree.

    For example I gave the Byzantines a bunch of specific cities to capture and they went about doing exactly that.
    Then why doesn't anyone go after Jerusalem? That is in most faction's long campaign objectives. Nobody ever came close to attacking me except the Mongols. Or is it because I'm on E/E? (Of course, I'm only playing on E/E for research purposes... )
    Pa bati kachó no falta palu.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Is Milan to Strong?

    In my game, Jerusalem has been held successively by Egypt, HRE, the Mongols, the Pope, the Timurids, the Pope again, and the Timurids again.

    I'm playing as the English on M/M---I have more than 45 territories, but I'm enjoying the back and forth over Jerusalem. I'll probably wait till turn 224 (I'm on 208) before taking it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO