Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Are Roman AI a bit strange at 0.8?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Are Roman AI a bit strange at 0.8?

    In my campaigns they do send them south, but mostly first to Rhegio then Tharas, but if they get beaten bad at tharas they mostly lose interest and wenture north.

  2. #2
    Member Member Dumbass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Incognito
    Posts
    387

    Default Re: Are Roman AI a bit strange at 0.8?

    I've seen in a few of the ai prgression pictures that the romans go into west germany and lose their holdings in italy, thus become the holy roman empire. While it's quite cool, it's quite annoying only ever seeing the romans move into germany. A way to get rid of this problem would be to add the boii as a faction, but that wouldn't happen until EB2. Another way you could change it would be to make the mediolanium province stretch across northern italy, blocking it off from all the provinces north of it: thus the romans would have to take mediolanium before it could advance any further north, and they would start moving south for Rhegion.

  3. #3
    Sovereign Oppressor Member TIE Fighter Shooter Champion, Turkey Shoot Champion, Juggler Champion Kralizec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,812

    Default Re: Are Roman AI a bit strange at 0.8?

    Epeiros has problems with Macedon, too. They very rarely manage to take Pella- it shouldn't happen every time of course, but I've never seen them do it at all. Instead the KH usually manage to take Thessaly and Chalkis first, then Pella and steamroll the entire Balkan peninsula in about half a century.

    The problem is, I guess, that Epeiros tends to expand northwards into the rebel lands. While taking Dalminion early on is sound strategy because it has mines and can train those Illyrian units, they don't spend enough time trying to take over Pella. The KH's only land route for expansion, apart from Aetolia, is through Makedonia.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Are Roman AI a bit strange at 0.8?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenring
    Epeiros has problems with Macedon, too. They very rarely manage to take Pella- it shouldn't happen every time of course, but I've never seen them do it at all. Instead the KH usually manage to take Thessaly and Chalkis first, then Pella and steamroll the entire Balkan peninsula in about half a century.

    The problem is, I guess, that Epeiros tends to expand northwards into the rebel lands. While taking Dalminion early on is sound strategy because it has mines and can train those Illyrian units, they don't spend enough time trying to take over Pella. The KH's only land route for expansion, apart from Aetolia, is through Makedonia.
    Not necessarily! In my last campaign as Carthage, I was trying to keep Epeiros alive as a buffer between Sicily and Romans. So I gave them about 10-15000 now and then. For about 5-7 years they fought the romans for me and even captured Capua (which they lost after other 3 tours). Behold, the next time I check the map, they have conquered the Balkans. Macedon and Greeks were reduced to one city away from the continent (Rhodos for Greeks and the island city next to Pergamon for Macedon). Their next move seemed to be Nikea but soon after Spain was mine and I stopped playing.
    Last edited by cezarip; 02-15-2007 at 14:47.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Are Roman AI a bit strange at 0.8?

    Epeiros will be more likely to take Pella as AI in 0.81. It's happening more often. The problem is that in 272 they were on something of an upswing - if they hadn't sent a large army with all their best generals to the Peloponnese to be totally ruined during that very year. They might be a little too strong in 0.81, but if we see that is the case on AI progression screenshots (posted by fans) then we will probably reduce the garrison in Taras (and fans can do it themselves in descr_strat.txt if they like by commenting out one or two units). But lets see how it goes first.

  6. #6
    Βασιλευς και Αυτοκρατωρ Αρχης Member Centurio Nixalsverdrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Γερμανια Ελευθερα
    Posts
    2,321

    Default AW: Are Roman AI a bit strange at 0.8?

    In my Roman Campaign I first took Taras, then made peace with Epeiros. Soon after that the Epirotes took Pella, and the Macedons came into serious problems. After I had conquered the rebellious but wealthy area up to the Danube (and bought Mediolanum for 9000 mnai :lol:), I decided to finish Epeiros up, took the two remaining origninal provinces and made an alliance with the poor Macedons, supporting them with 5000 mnai a turn. That helped them pretty much and made it possible for them to take Athens. But they did not make any attempt to recover Pella, although the Epirotean garrison was really worthless.
    Last edited by Centurio Nixalsverdrus; 02-15-2007 at 18:52.

  7. #7
    EBII Council Senior Member Kull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    El Paso, TX
    Posts
    13,502

    Default Re: Are Roman AI a bit strange at 0.8?

    As we were preparing the final pieces of the Patch, we spotted (and fixed) a rather nasty bug that impacted Rome. Long story short, it seems to have frozen their Camillan Era MICs at the game start levels. As a result, they wouldn't have been able to produce enough really good units to make your lives the misery they should be. But that will change soon.
    "Numidia Delenda Est!"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO