View Poll Results: Please vote yay or nay to the following edicts

Voters
10. This poll is closed
  • Edict 3.1: Yes

    7 70.00%
  • Edict 3.1: No

    3 30.00%
  • Edict 3.2: Yes

    8 80.00%
  • Edict 3.2: No

    2 20.00%
  • Edict 3.4: Yes

    3 30.00%
  • Edict 3.4: No

    7 70.00%
  • Edict 3.5: Yes

    3 30.00%
  • Edict 3.5: No

    7 70.00%
  • Edict 3.6: Yes

    6 60.00%
  • Edict 3.6: No

    4 40.00%
  • Edict 3.8: Yes

    4 40.00%
  • Edict 3.8: No

    5 50.00%
  • Edict 3.10: Yes

    9 90.00%
  • Edict 3.10: No

    0 0%
  • Edict 3.11: Yes

    8 80.00%
  • Edict 3.11: No

    2 20.00%
  • Edict 3.15: Yes

    7 70.00%
  • Edict 3.15: No

    2 20.00%
  • Charter Ammendment 3.1: Yes

    10 100.00%
  • Charter Ammendment 3.1: No

    0 0%
  • Charter Ammendment 3.3: Yes

    10 100.00%
  • Charter Ammendment 3.3: No

    0 0%
  • I abstain on all motions

    0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Third Diet Edicts - Poll

  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Third Diet Edicts - Poll

    This vote is for players in the King of the Romans thread. The text of the motions is:

    Edict 3.1: The Chancellor shall seek to have Milan cease to exist by the conclusion of his term.
    ---Proposed: Kaiser Heinrich
    ---Seconded: Otto von Kassel, Maximillian Mandorf

    Edict 3.2: The Chancellor is to keep his alliance with Sicily, thus disobeying the Papal Order.
    ---Proposed: Kaiser Heinrich
    ---Seconded: Maximillian Mandorf, Duke Leopold

    Edict 3.4: A defensive war will be fought with Milan, no incursions into their territory, until they are excommunicated or our standing with the Pope is "very good" or higher.
    ---Proposed: Otto von Kassel
    ---Seconded: Prinz Henry, Fourth Elector of Austria (AussieGiant)

    Edict 3.5: "Sigismund der Stolze, Count of Lorraine, requests permission of the this assembled Diet to attack the court of Rome, should he become Chancellor"
    ---Proposed: Sigismund der Stolze
    ---Seconded: Maximillian Mandorf, Kaiser Heinrich

    Edict 3.6: The Chancellor has to avoid excommunication to the best of his abilities, by agreeing to the following: No offensive war may lead to excommunication and no attack on Rome is to be made.
    ---Proposed: Duke Leopold
    ---Seconded: Fourth Elector of Austria (AussieGiant); Prince Henry

    Edict 3.8: Milan is to be crushed by an offensive campaign, one that does not wait for Papal opinion or any other outside factor to strike. Kaiser Heinrich is to have a major role in this campaign.
    ---Proposed: Kaiser Heinrich
    ---Seconded: Maximillian Mandorf, Sigismund der Stolze

    Edict 3.10: If Rome is assaulted and Kaiser Heinrich is alive, he must lead the attack.
    ---Proposed: Maximillian Mandorf
    ---Seconded: Kaiser Heinrich, Otto von Kassel

    Edict 3.11: The Chancellor will endeavor to construct naval forces capable of blockades and transport of mid-sized armies in the Baltic and especially the Mediterranean. Dukes and Counts are encouraged by the Diet to build port facilities in their domains, if applicable.
    ---Proposed: Otto von Kasel
    ---Seconded: Prince Henry, Maximillian Mandorf

    Edict 3.15: Taking the city of Milan,taking the city of Genoa and taking the city of Dijon.
    ---[B ]Proposed[/B]: Fifth Elector of Swabia (Kagemusha)
    ---Seconded: Otto von Kassel, Maximillian Mandorf

    Charter Amendment 3.1: Stewards may bestow the rank of Count on nobles of their House. This Amendment does not give Stewards any other Ducal power, it does not give Stewards additional Influence, nor does it allow Stewards to be Counts themselves.
    ---Proposed: Maximillian Mandorf
    ---Seconded: Duke Leopold, Prinz Henry

    Charter Amendment 3.3: Replace point 3.10 with

    "Influential players get bonus votes (max +5 bonus)

    Appointed Influence (Max 3 points):
    Duke: +2
    Count: +1
    Chancellor, ex-Chancellor, or Prince: +1

    Stat Influence (Max 2 points):
    15 or more total stat points: +1 (I thought about a lower number, but all avatars are given a base 3 piety and base 5 loyalty, which means those points are freebies. So, 15 is only 7 from actual traits, plus the 8 piety and loyalty freebies)
    6 or more ranks in one stat: +1 (In the unlikely scenario where a character gets 6 or more in 2 stats without having 15 total, they get this +1 twice)

    The player who is Emperor gets bonus votes differently, being equal to his authority."

    Replace 4.5 with:

    "Counts are governors of their settlements. Dukes govern settlements that are allocated to their Houses but not to a Count. The Emperor governs settlements that are not allocated to any House."
    ---Proposed: Econ21
    ---Seconded: GeneralHankerchief, AussieGiant
    ---Note: Please discuss this amendment in the OOC thread.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Third Diet Edicts - Poll

    Provisional results as of 23.27 UK time:

    Edict 3.1:
    Yes : AussieGiant, Ignoramus (+2), Ituralde (+4), Overknight (+1), TinCow (+3), GH (+4)
    No : Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Kagemusha , FLYdude
    PASSED 21 to 7

    Edict 3.2:
    Yes : AussieGiant, Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Ignoramus (+2), Ituralde (+4), TinCow (+3), GH (+4), FLYdude
    No :Kagemusha, Overknight (+1)
    PASSED 25 to 3

    Edict 3.4:
    Yes :Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Overknight (+1)
    No : AussieGiant, Ignoramus (+2), Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, TinCow (+3), GH (+4), FLYdude
    FAILED 8 to 20

    Edict 3.5:
    Yes :Ignoramus (+2), TinCow (+3), GH (+4)
    No : AussieGiant, Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1), FLYdude
    FAILED 12 to 16

    Edict 3.6:
    Yes :AussieGiant, Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1)
    No :Ignoramus (+2), TinCow (+3), GH (+4), FLYdude
    PASSED 15 to 13

    Edict 3.8:
    Yes : econ21 (+4), Ignoramus (+2), TinCow (+3), GH (+4)
    No :AussieGiant, Dutch_guy, Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1)
    PASSED 17 to 10

    Edict 3.10:
    Yes : AussieGiant, Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Ignoramus (+2), Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1), TinCow (+3), GH (+4)
    PASSED

    Edict 3.11:
    Yes :Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Ignoramus (+2), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1), TinCow (+3), GH (+4), FLYdude
    No: AussieGiant, Ituralde (+4)
    PASSED

    Edict 3.15:
    Yes : AussieGiant, Ignoramus (+2), Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1), TinCow (+3), GH (+4)
    No : Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4)
    PASSED

    Charter Ammendments 3.1 & 3.3: Passed with no opposition
    Last edited by econ21; 02-16-2007 at 09:07.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO