Over a year ago, I seem to recall you ridiculing the assertion that Saddam's failure to comply with the strict letter of the ceasefire agreement following the ousting of his troops from Kuwait was a valid pretext for US/coalition military efforts against his regime. Remember that argument?
Nope I stated that the ceasefire conditions were under the authority which was used for those conditions , the same authority that approved the original action , and the process to remove the suspension that the ceasefire gave and revert to the original approval clearly stipulates that a new vote was needed . The coilition didn't bother with the new vote to remove the suspension and reactivate the original approval so it cannot be a valid action can it .
Now you can say that the countries had their soverign right to act how they wanted , but the authorty for the conditions were under another body so they cannot be used as justification unless they go through the same body .

Honestius , that constitution thing , thats the part that says it must be printed and distributed for people to look at and discuss before voting , by rushing to amend the incomplete document for the last minute push to meet the deadline that part was not fulfilled was it .