alright luigi, if you want to turn this into an actual discussion i will oblige.
oh wait, srry luigi i don't understand, are you defending them, or mocking them or just quoting them, i'm honestly not sure.
first off, how can you accept this as a reasonable answer, there just dodging the question.
how do you explain the basic laws of physics in this feild described?Q: Follow-up to previous question: How is it that the Earth does not have a gravitational pull, but stars and the moon do?
A: This argument is a non sequitur. You might as well ask, "How is it that snakes do not have legs, but dogs and cats do?" Snakes are not dogs or cats. The Earth is not a star or the moon. It doesn't follow that each must have exactly the properties of the others, and no more.
where does the gravity for the FE earths ascent originate from.
how long ago was this conspiracy came up with?
explain meteors.
why isn't the edge of the ice ring in perpetual darkness?
how come third world countries can keep up the conspiracy but not feed there people.
how can we make money on the ice wall?
why do the inuits not know about this?
explain the dinosaurs.
when did the FE earth originate?
does god have a part in this?
any of you seen any evidence not just conceptual?
what physics involved could shape all the bodies of the world into disks and face them all directly at earth so we could not see there edges?
who paid off columbus?
why is'nt all areas around the ice wall extremely cold?
how do buirds such as arctic terns navigate, by the government altered GPS?
i've got more questions but lets see you handle these.
Bookmarks