Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Altered battlemaps in vanilla M:TW, anyone?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #13
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: Altered battlemaps in vanilla M:TW, anyone?

    Thanks for the comments, gentlemen.

    I am working on a Zeugma map right now. It could be used in Kaidonni's mod and it is meant as an encouragement for those interested in his mod.

    Zeugma is the Roman name for the town of Selevkeia, founded by Selevkos I Nicator to guard the only available Euphrates crossing between Antiochia and what was known at different times as the Selevkid Kingdom, the Kingdom of Commagene and Parthia. Zeugma was always a major town and strategic asset. King Antiochus III of Syria held his wedding there in in 221 BC. In 53 BC general Crassus stormed the Zeugma bridge and was defeated by the Parthians. Around 49 AD the Romans based a legion in a huge castellum in the hills above Zeugma.

    Overlooking the valley on the western side is Belkis tepe, an old temple mount originally dedicated to Tyche. On the shores on either side are the old pastachio orchards, the pride of the local peasantry. Down river from the bridge on the western side is Zeugma town, up river on the eastern side is its sister town Apamea. In the background on the eastern side will be the rugged Anatolian plateau.

    Yes, I love Turkey's historical grounds, a cradle of civilisations since the Hittites.

    'Zeugma' would be a bridge battle for those attacking Antioch out of (MTW province of) Edessa. But I hate no-brainer bridge battles, so I am playing a bit with the batinit set-up. I am not changing the code (which would be generic for all bridge battles), I just adapt the map. I place the bridge slightly further north on the battlemap so as to avoid the predictability of most MTW bridge battles. Before the battle can be joined the defender will have to rush quite a distance to get to his defensive positions, which forces him to adapt his army composition (more cavalry, less spears) and gives the attacker a break at the start of the game. In fact both players will be rushing for the bridge, the defender having the advantage of height and some minor fortifications, and the disadvantage of a fully built-up area his side of the bridge

    As soon as I can I will edit this 'ere message to post a screenie of my effort.
    Last edited by Adrian II; 02-27-2007 at 14:12.
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO