Completly diffrent things. People questioning the numbers presented at the battles you talk of can hardly be called revisionists because of that. I made a major post in I think the topic you talk about quoting and citing historians that have nothing in common with the holocaustdeniers.This Holocaust body count argument reminds me an awful alot of the discussions surrounding the actual number of men present in the Persian army at Thermopylae and Gaugamela. Thanks to the lack of documentation or supporting evidence people can argue endlessly about those figures. Even reasonable figures are hotly contested. Back and forth, back and forth, blah blah.
You can not call yourself a historian if you do not question and scrutinize every statement in the sources you use in your work.
Kalle
Bookmarks