This is a bit of a newb question, but I am having trouble reconciling my style of playing RTW with MTW2. I'm used to the good old days where an elite force of heavily armed and armored soldiers would simply smash a lesser group. A solid Cohort could be counted on to stand in a breach and make the enemy pay for every inch. Now when I commit my elite units in MTW2 I am a little shocked to see how ineffective they are compared to the elite units of past Total War games. I watch in horror as my foot knights, clad head to tow in plate, get absolutely mauled by lesser units. This includes everything, archers, crossbowmen, militia, I even watched as a unit of armored sgt's was destroyed almost completely by a group of peasants. I've watched a single pavise crossbowman kill 3 elite soldiers in rapid succession before any of them even engaged him. Even when things are clearly in my favor, I still take a real beating. It used to be that a poorly organized rebel army would leave 10 men on the field for every one of yours. Now I feel like losing "only" 500 knights to 1000 militia is a major success. My militia on the other hand still seem to get stomped on even I have a tactical advantage. It just seems that in a drag out melee I always have the short end of the stick. What gives?
I have played the Total War games since Shogun and never had this steep a learning curve. One that I am still having difficulty overcoming. Am I playing incorrectly? Is this game all about massed formations of cheap units? with previous games I would never think of using anything with the word "militia" in the title for anything but population control or severe emergencies.
I'm playing as Germany with campaign set to the hardest setting but battles set to medium. I feel like I must be doing something wrong though, could someone shed some light?
Bookmarks