That's exactly my point. It actually gives MEANING to those options you get when you take a city.Originally Posted by Xdeathfire
Right now, as it stands, since sacking is so utterly neutral in all regards, players can nearly make infinite money by blitzing and sacking cities. There are absolutely no reprecussions.
Sacking should be a short term benefit, one where the risk of destruction is outweighed by the amount of money you can bring in and the city's lack of strategic importance.
So, if you are blitzing, and a city is huge and of strategic value, you shouldn't be able to get away with getting 30,000 some florins with no hell to pay. If you are intent on holding the city for your own with, it would be nice to have to think harder about what you want to do.
Bookmarks