Battle casualty healing.
I've noticed that in battles the unit I send first into battle usually get casualties healed at the rate 25%, whilst later sent units don't get any or very few.
This might be important if you say charge with your feudal knights first, rather than say use a sacrifice charge of pilgrims.
Thats my impression anyway, anyone have a better thought than this?
I havn't been able to track other posts on this topic.
BTW are there any doctors or healer traits to further reduce casualties.?
Such is life- Ned Kelly -his last words just before he was hanged.
Re: Battle casualty healing.
Well, if the enemy takes prisoners due to routing and you won the battle, the prisoners that you have freed count as being healed. Since the units first into battle are the ones that rout the earliest, that will probably account for thir higher casualty healing
"I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me." - Issac Newton
Re: Battle casualty healing.
@xdeathfire - that's quite likely, although not many player armies rount
@razor - yes, i believe that the muslim factions have a 'hospital' series of buildings that let you pick up ancilleries like that
From wise men, O Lord, protect us -anon
The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of millions, a statistic -Stalin
We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area -UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer
Re: Battle casualty healing.
Yep, Bimaristans lets you pick up doctors if you stay in the settlement. Also, you can pick them up if you lose more than 50% of your army in a battle.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks