Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 32

Thread: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

  1. #1
    L'Etranger Senior Member Banquo's Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hunting the Snark, a long way from Tipperary...
    Posts
    5,604

    Default Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    This is an interesting opinion piece for those of us interested in the struggle for power in Britain.

    Gordon Brown seems to be fading from his position as heir apparent. I don't know any of my British friends who think he can win the next general election - and several are Labour voters. David Milliband seems to think no-one can win the next election for New Labour, and that the sensible thing to do would be to stay quiet until Brown gets humiliated by the electorate and he can step in as the new New Labourite in opposition.

    Yet the columnist posits another possibility - that Blair regrets his decision and might be persuaded to stay on. There has been no popular acclaim for Brown and he's looking wounded - might the PM change his mind? If he did, could he win the next election? - despite his record, he is still a formidable campaigner, and the Tories really ought to be 20 points ahead given his woes.

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Bruce Anderson: Gordon Brown's fortunes are ebbing away

    Milburn and Clarke speak for many Labour MPs who are afraid that he will not click with the voters
    Published: 05 March 2007


    The Labour Party leadership race is a bullfight without a matador. The Brown bull is charging around the ring becoming angrier and angrier, as well he might, because every few minutes a banderillero rushes in, flings a dart at him and then runs away, too fast to be gored and eviscerated. We can be certain of one thing. If a challenger does appear, it will be a cracking contest. No bull has ever been so taunted and maddened.

    Political parties which lose confidence in their leader or his heir presumptive have a difficulty. They cannot keep their worries to themselves. The confessional rapidly turns into a recording studio and the electorate listens in. Charles Clarke and Alan Milburn have been hoping to raise doubts about Gordon Brown without supplying the Tories with too much quotable material (Mr Clarke had already done that). But neither man is designed to be a tightrope walker. They can only celebrate their good fortune. Gordon Brown is not yet in charge of the safety net.

    Disregard the talk of new visions for 2020. Trying to work out what Messrs Clarke and Milburn mean by policies is like trying to carry water in a sieve. But none of this is about policy. It is about personality: Gordon Brown's personality. Charles Clarke and Alan Milburn are speaking for a lot of Labour MPs who are afraid that Mr Brown will not click with the voters. He will clunk with them, and they will clunk back.

    It is still probable that Gordon Brown will become PM. But one fear ought to be gnawing at his vitals. Where are his troops? Why have the airwaves not been inundated by Brownites, contemptuously dismissing the carpers while urging their fellow MPs to line the route for the coronation? Although David Miliband may be some way off commanding a majority of Labour MPs, he has the enthusiasts. The 50th Milibandite hopping for a chance to sign up to his campaign is far more motivated than the 50th Brownite muttering that he supposes it has to be Gordon. Last September's Brownite coup has turned into this March's collapsed soufflé.

    David Miliband must feel flattered, and alarmed. Two months ago, I am told, he regarded a leadership bid as an amusing dream, which would instantly become a nightmare if he tried to turn it into reality. That was then, long before the recent polls. Although Mr Miliband is not at all arrogant, it cannot be easy to retain your humility when so many colleagues are pressing you to have a crack at the premiership.

    Immediately after the Tory leadership contest in 1990, Douglas Hurd mused he had never really thought he could win. But a number of people whom he respected had urged him to stand. He decided that if he did not have a go, he would regret it later. If Mr Miliband did run, he would do a lot better than Douglas Hurd did. Then again, Gordon Brown would not emulate John Major's effortless generosity towards defeated rivals.

    So what are they making of all this, next door in Number 10? At present, Tony Blair seems more interested in adding new American billionaires to his Rolodex. On one point, we can be certain. Amid all the talk of legacies and saving the planet, Mr Blair has one goal at the forefront of his plans. He is determined that after leaving Downing Street, he will make more money than any previous prime minister.

    So he will, just as long as Scotland Yard does not inconvenience him. Then again, let us assume the PM does avoid serious embarrassment at the hands of Commander Yates. Tony Blair is young. There are reports that he regrets committing himself to leaving office. It cannot be long before some Labour MP goes public to beg him to reconsider.

    One Labour backbencher made an interesting comment last week. He asked me what would have happened if Bill Clinton had been able to run again in 2000. I said that he would have won. If Al Gore came that close, Clinton would surely have done better. "Precisely,'' came the reply. "But we don't have term limits. So why are we swapping Clinton for Gore?''

    I doubt if there is a way back for Mr Blair. The Labour MPs who regard him as an alien implant - GM Labour - are far more numerous than the ones who respect his election- winning record. But everything is unstable; everyone is uneasy. Outside the inner Brownite tribe, there seems to be little confidence. Where there is no way forward, the way back has its attractions.

    It is hard to know what Gordon Brown could do to make himself an attraction. There is a Budget in two weeks' time. There is no money to spend. No doubt the Chancellor will be up to his usual game of re-announcing spending increases which he has announced several times already. These days, however, everyone is aware of the tricks. The commentators will rush to the small print to deconstruct the Budget, exposing the double and treble counting, the quadruple and quintuple announcing - plus, no doubt, the new stealth tax increases which Mr Brown somehow forgets to mention in his speech.

    Yet the Budget will go less badly for him than the Scottish elections. Labour will suffer, and it will be impossible for Gordon Brown to disassociate himself from the defeat. Many English voters will conclude that if his fellow Scots do not believe in him, why should they?

    Even so, there is still no matador in sight. But it is worth remembering that the bull never survives the bullfight.
    "If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
    Albert Camus "Noces"

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member English assassin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    London, innit
    Posts
    3,734

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    If we overlook the fact that its Bruce Anderson and therefore automatically suspect.

    Its clear, I think, that Brown as PM will deliver no better a result for labour at the polls than Blair. (I have to say I disagree that Blair is a particularly formidable campaigner, Clinton he ain't) In which case it must be credible that Blair will ask himself, well, why go? Especially as "the legacy" is non existent.

    The only answer I can see is that we REALLY want Blair to go. The fact that we don't want the alternatives does not detract from the fact that we want Blair out. After all, no one was gagging to have John Major as PM in 1990, but we got him, and he went on to win a tricky election against a newly confident labour party.

    Which was of course a huge disaster for the party.

    That said Brown vs Cameron might not even be funny. Cameron is, after all, the Tory Blair (the second Tory Blair, to be accurate. I described Cameron as Blair Mk 2 to a friend of mine who is an old communist, and he remarked bitterly, yes, well its all right for you, at least you EXPECT to have a Tory as the leader of your party.)

    Seriously, my wife says she would never vote for Brown because he is so grumpy. (Women, eh. 50% of the electorate too. ) She thinks Cameron is phoney but still prefers him.

    I'm telling you, I think Posh is back.
    "The only thing I've gotten out of this thread is that Navaros is claiming that Satan gave Man meat. Awesome." Gorebag

  3. #3
    ............... Member Scurvy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,489

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Its becoming a bit of a hopeless situation for labour, Blair is hugely unpopular, and his own party won't let him stay on too much longer, even if he wanted too,

    Brown is too much associated with Blair, and does'nt really come over all that well to a media-fed electorate, that said, i think he would be an improvement over Blair... It might be that he is not as good as Blair at poll-winning, but the knowledge that Blair is leaving might raise labour's support overall anyway...

    Cameron is very similar to Blair, but its worth waiting until he actually announces some "substance" and policies before making that judgment, it may well be that he is more Tory than he makes out, and is attempting to take the centre ground in an attempt gain votes from the lib-dems and labour, through temporarily moderating his views...

    I honestly think an in=party election for pm would be a disaster for labour, Brown would win, but the party would potentially fall apart.... no other Labour politician has the power, experience, or support to beat him, but could damage the apry image by trying...

    If i was Conservative, i'd be wanting Blair to stay on for as long as possible, because as long as he is around they are loosing popularity...

    Last edited by Scurvy; 03-05-2007 at 19:21.

  4. #4
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    So, if Gordy did the Jade Goody 'workout' he'd be a shoe in?
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  5. #5
    Join the ICLADOLLABOJADALLA! Member IrishArmenian's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Writing the book, every day...
    Posts
    1,986

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Will Tony Blair finally realise his strangle hold on the UK is slipping away and his time is at an end, therefore releasing the whole of Britain from the American Lap Dog status?

















































































    Sadly, no.

    "Half of your brain is that of a ten year old and the other half is that of a ten year old that chainsmokes and drinks his liver dead!" --Hagop Beegan

  6. #6
    Hand Bacon Member ShadeHonestus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1,167

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    How long does a British farewell tour take anyways?
    "There is a true glory and a true honor; the glory in duty done and the honor in the integrity of principle."

    "The truth is this; the march of Providence so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often only see the ebb of the advancing wave. It is history which teaches us to hope."

  7. #7
    Dux Nova Scotia Member lars573's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Halifax NewScotland Canada
    Posts
    4,114

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    As long as he wants. Or until the Labour party caucus tosses him out. Which is what happened to "the iron lady" about 20 years ago. There are no hard and fast rules about this sort of thing. Particularly in the mother country. Where everything functions on tradition.


    But I must ask. How does the official selection of a new party leader function in Britain? Will the labours conviene a leadership convention and make a big show of electing a new leader?


    An opinion piece on the exit of Blair.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Tony Blair’s curious finale

    SILVER DONALD CAMERON



    PITY TONY BLAIR. These days, even when he tries to do something positive, it turns out badly.

    For example, Blair instituted a website where citizens could contact his office directly. This shows the British PM as a populist, groovy and contemporary.

    But then, having commissioned the Stern Report, which warned Sternly about global warming, Blair proposed a road tax to ease congestion and cut vehicle emissions by discouraging automobile use. The tax would reflect the number of kilometres people drove. Every vehicle’s movements would be tracked by satellite, and every owner would receive a bill at the end of the month. The tax might be as much as C$2 per kilometre for rush-hour driving.

    BOOM! Irate motorists overwhelmed the PM’s website with 1.8 million e-mails. As my British friend Peter Bonsey wrote to me: "The objections to this scheme are so compelling that this dreadful government will almost certainly press ahead."

    Cost aside, what were the objections?

    Civil liberties and privacy, to start with. Britain already has a vast number of closed-circuit TV cameras spying on its citizens, and the government proposes to institute a national identity card. The idea that the government would also track every single movement of every single car is simply Orwellian.

    Second, a tax-based scheme is immoral, because it would completely stop the poor from driving long before it forces the wealthy to cut back. Third, Britons see the new tax as a straightforward revenue grab — and because the government gets the money, the tax motivates the government not to reduce fuel use but to increase it.

    There’s a better way to reduce fuel use, Bonsey says, and we’ll get to that. But I had just seen the Stephen Frears film The Queen, featuring Michael Sheen’s bright and sure-handed portrayal of the young Tony Blair. The movie reminded me that Blair has been a truly remarkable public figure.

    A peacemaker in Ireland, the creator of the Welsh and Scottish assemblies, promoter of the Human Rights Act and the Freedom of Information Act, Blair has also eliminated the ban on gays in the armed forces and achieved legal recognition of gay partnerships. He has presided over a decade of British life as the first Labour prime minister ever to achieve three successive majority governments.

    But now, as he approaches retirement, Blair’s legacy is deeply stained by a cash-for-honours scandal and by his eager support for the Americans in Iraq. Blair has also imposed stringent anti-terrorism laws that, together with his identity card and road tax proposals, place him in the unlovely posture of a Big Brother, prying endlessly into the private lives of British citizens.

    The objectives of the road tax, Bonsey says, could be met much more simply and elegantly by using "a smart carbon card. The idea here is that every citizen who is of an age to be allowed a driving licence, and whether or not they hold one, is given a road fuel allowance each year. When you go to the petrol pump, you insert your card, which confirms you have some ration left, and then you buy and pay for the fuel in the usual way."

    In effect, this is fuel rationing. If you want to drive a gas-guzzler, you may — but you won’t be able to drive it very far unless you buy carbon credits from someone else who isn’t using them. The scheme sets an absolute limit on fuel use for the country as a whole but allows the market to decide who uses the fuel. Those who conserve — by using public transit, for instance — will profit by selling their credits. Wastrels will pay heavily.

    The government isn’t allowed anywhere near the scheme, Bonsey notes, so it will be seen as being honest.

    "The government sets what it regards as the limit the environment can take and that amount cannot be exceeded because the permits don’t exist."

    Other fuel uses — air travel, home heating and the like — could ultimately be handled the same way. Over time, governments could steadily cut fuel use and emissions just by reducing the total number of carbon credits they issue every year.

    So I repeat what I said about pay-as-you-drive insurance. Honourable gentlemen and ladies in all our governments, including the Labour government of the United Kingdom, why don’t you stop postulating vast schemes to deal with climate change and devote a little attention to the pursuit of what’s possible?

    Like pay-as-you-drive insurance, a smart carbon card could significantly mitigate the environmental damage we’re doing. Like PAYD, it doesn’t involve ideology and it doesn’t create unbearable hardships or windfall profits for governments or corporations. It rewards responsible behaviour and penalizes anti-social practices. And it can be done with the stroke of a pen.

    What are we waiting for?


    http://www.herald.ns.ca/NovaScotian/562599.html
    Last edited by lars573; 03-06-2007 at 04:30.
    If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.

    VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI

    I came, I saw, I kicked ass

  8. #8
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Brown is known for a penchant for taxing everything and making the taxes as byzantine as possible. Loads of credits, discounts and forms.

    He thinks and acts like a Civil Service Manderin, and is as electable. Who wants his mate in the Treasury screwing even more money out of everyone whilst he sits in number 10.

    Possibly I'm bieng harsh. The campaigns proper havn't started. Possibly there are many policies he'd instigate.

    If we were Labour he'd be one reason I'd finally vote as although I am not thrilled with the prospects the Tories offer ANYTHING is better than him. At least the Tories will reduce the tax burden (I hope)

    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

  9. #9
    probably bored Member BDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Britain
    Posts
    5,508

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Possibly I'm bieng harsh. The campaigns proper havn't started. Possibly there are many policies he'd instigate.
    I don't think we need more of those. Maybe a consolidation parliament where the slightly more bizarre legislation is removed, and the other bits improved to the point it all works fairly well.

    Then we can have another round of random changes without much thinking.

  10. #10
    Hope guides me Senior Member Hosakawa Tito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Western New Yuck
    Posts
    7,914

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    I hear Al Gore is looking for steady employment.....
    "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." *Jim Elliot*

  11. #11
    probably bored Member BDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Britain
    Posts
    5,508

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hosakawa Tito
    I hear Al Gore is looking for steady employment.....
    He'd be good.

    No more good relations with America!

  12. #12
    Hand Bacon Member ShadeHonestus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1,167

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by BDC
    He'd be good.

    No more good relations with America!
    Yeah, sugar daddies get old...
    "There is a true glory and a true honor; the glory in duty done and the honor in the integrity of principle."

    "The truth is this; the march of Providence so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often only see the ebb of the advancing wave. It is history which teaches us to hope."

  13. #13
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by BDC
    I don't think we need more of those. Maybe a consolidation parliament where the slightly more bizarre legislation is removed, and the other bits improved to the point it all works fairly well.

    Then we can have another round of random changes without much thinking.
    There should be a commission tasked with sorting out much of the crap in parliment (such as archaic laws).

    I agree that action = good without thought to possible knock on effects. It seems that whoever "thinks" of policy forgets that the system's dynamic will react to the action - and the net result is not always for the better.

    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

  14. #14
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    On the Al Gore thingy. I know that the president of the US has to be a US citizen and not a naturalized one but is there any similar impediment in the UK to a foreigner becoming an MP and thus PM?

    Back OT.

    Somehow I wouldn't have spit my cornflakes out if I'd heard this morning that Blair would go on and on.....it's only the memory of what happed to Maggie that prompted this in the first instance.
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  15. #15
    L'Etranger Senior Member Banquo's Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hunting the Snark, a long way from Tipperary...
    Posts
    5,604

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by InsaneApache
    On the Al Gore thingy. I know that the president of the US has to be a US citizen and not a naturalized one but is there any similar impediment in the UK to a foreigner becoming an MP and thus PM?
    I don't think so. Andrew Bonar Law was born in Canada, but at a time when it was a Dominion, so that might not be a good example. A naturalised person may stand for election as an MP, so they ought to be able to then become PM.

    As far as I know, the only current restrictions are that a hereditary peer must relinquish his title (to be able to stand for the Commons) and the Prime Minister cannot be a Roman Catholic.

    Those more learned than I may be able to confirm or otherwise.

    EDIT: On further research, there is no constitutional barrier to a catholic becoming prime minister - merely some awkwardness over the State functions of such a PM advising HM Queen on Anglican Bishops.
    Last edited by Banquo's Ghost; 03-07-2007 at 10:32.
    "If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
    Albert Camus "Noces"

  16. #16
    Senior Member Senior Member Fisherking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East of Augusta Vindelicorum
    Posts
    5,575

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
    ....... and the Prime Minister cannot be a Roman Catholic.
    What? This is not a joke is it!


    Education: that which reveals to the wise,
    and conceals from the stupid,
    the vast limits of their knowledge.
    Mark Twain

  17. #17
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    The Act of Settlement says that the Monarch cannot be a Roman Catholic. It seems that the PM can be one though. Tony is often to be found on bended knee, fumbling with his beads and muttering under his breath......and that's just in cabinet meetings!
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  18. #18
    Hand Bacon Member ShadeHonestus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1,167

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by InsaneApache
    The Act of Settlement says that the Monarch cannot be a Roman Catholic. It seems that the PM can be one though. Tony is often to be found on bended knee, fumbling with his beads and muttering under his breath......and that's just in cabinet meetings!
    Is that a homosexual reference?
    "There is a true glory and a true honor; the glory in duty done and the honor in the integrity of principle."

    "The truth is this; the march of Providence so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often only see the ebb of the advancing wave. It is history which teaches us to hope."

  19. #19
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by ShadeHonestus
    Is that a homosexual reference?


    I didn't post it as one. Onanism does spring to mind though, now you mention it.
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  20. #20
    Sovereign Oppressor Member TIE Fighter Shooter Champion, Turkey Shoot Champion, Juggler Champion Kralizec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,812

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
    I don't think so. Andrew Bonar Law was born in Canada, but at a time when it was a Dominion, so that might not be a good example. A naturalised person may stand for election as an MP, so they ought to be able to then become PM.

    As far as I know, the only current restrictions are that a hereditary peer must relinquish his title (to be able to stand for the Commons) and the Prime Minister cannot be a Roman Catholic.

    Those more learned than I may be able to confirm or otherwise.

    EDIT: On further research, there is no constitutional barrier to a catholic becoming prime minister - merely some awkwardness over the State functions of such a PM advising HM Queen on Anglican Bishops.
    Isn't Blair a catholic?

  21. #21
    L'Etranger Senior Member Banquo's Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hunting the Snark, a long way from Tipperary...
    Posts
    5,604

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenring
    Isn't Blair a catholic?
    No. His wife is and his children are being brought up in the faith, but he has not converted as yet.
    "If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
    Albert Camus "Noces"

  22. #22
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    He also attends mass but can't partake of the sacrament, if that's the right word for it in the Roman Catholic church.

    *Brought up an Anglican Catholic*
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  23. #23
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by lars573
    But I must ask. How does the official selection of a new party leader function in Britain? Will the labours conviene a leadership convention and make a big show of electing a new leader?
    It varies by party. With Labour, I think candidates need 50 signatures from MPs and then the names are put to an "electoral college" - ie there is balloting among MPs, party members and Trade Unions, where each of the three parts get a share of a total vote (30:30:40 AFAIK). I may be wrong though. I would imagine the ballot would be synchronised with a party congress, so the new leader can be inaugurated to the acclaim of the party faithful.

  24. #24
    probably bored Member BDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Britain
    Posts
    5,508

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by econ21
    It varies by party. With Labour, I think candidates need 50 signatures from MPs and then the names are put to an "electoral college" - ie there is balloting among MPs, party members and Trade Unions, where each of the three parts get a share of a total vote (30:30:40 AFAIK). I may be wrong though. I would imagine the ballot would be synchronised with a party congress, so the new leader can be inaugurated to the acclaim of the party faithful.
    So basically the public will have no say on who will rule them, especially now Blair has crushed the power of Parliament. Go Britain!

  25. #25
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by BDC
    So basically the public will have no say on who will rule them, especially now Blair has crushed the power of Parliament. Go Britain!
    Oh phooey - the public vote in governments every 4-5 years, not whenever the "first among equals" steps down. I am not convinced directly electing a President is a better system, unless your family name is Bush or Clinton.

    But then again, why don't we put the succession to a public vote - Big Brother style? Chantelle for teh win.

  26. #26

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
    and the Prime Minister cannot be a Roman Catholic.
    Satanist candidates are fine, just not catholics...
    “The majestic equality of the laws prohibits the rich and the poor alike from sleeping under bridges, begging in the streets and stealing bread.” - Anatole France

    "The law is like a spider’s web. The small are caught, and the great tear it up.” - Anacharsis

  27. #27
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by econ21
    Oh phooey - the public vote in governments every 4-5 years, not whenever the "first among equals" steps down. I am not convinced directly electing a President is a better system, unless your family name is Bush or Clinton.

    But then again, why don't we put the succession to a public vote - Big Brother style? Chantelle for teh win.
    Nope. Sorry you're wrong, Every fool knows that Jade Goody would walk it......woman of the people an' all that.
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  28. #28
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by InsaneApache
    Every fool knows that Jade Goody would walk it......woman of the people an' all that.
    Yep, and a bit later, the public mood would shift and she would be publicly crucified. Oh, wait, that's what's already happened with Tony Blair...

  29. #29
    Dux Nova Scotia Member lars573's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Halifax NewScotland Canada
    Posts
    4,114

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
    I don't think so. Andrew Bonar Law was born in Canada, but at a time when it was a Dominion, so that might not be a good example. A naturalised person may stand for election as an MP, so they ought to be able to then become PM.

    As far as I know, the only current restrictions are that a hereditary peer must relinquish his title (to be able to stand for the Commons) and the Prime Minister cannot be a Roman Catholic.

    Those more learned than I may be able to confirm or otherwise.

    EDIT: On further research, there is no constitutional barrier to a catholic becoming prime minister - merely some awkwardness over the State functions of such a PM advising HM Queen on Anglican Bishops.
    Canada is still a dominion. But it doesn't mean the same thing as back then. Now it means that we, the Auzzie's, Kiwi's, Jamacans, etc. Get a say as to wether Charlie gets the throne or not.


    Quote Originally Posted by econ21
    It varies by party. With Labour, I think candidates need 50 signatures from MPs and then the names are put to an "electoral college" - ie there is balloting among MPs, party members and Trade Unions, where each of the three parts get a share of a total vote (30:30:40 AFAIK). I may be wrong though. I would imagine the ballot would be synchronised with a party congress, so the new leader can be inaugurated to the acclaim of the party faithful.
    Sounds familiar. Minus trade unions getting a vote. For us all party members get an equal vote.
    Last edited by lars573; 03-08-2007 at 00:17.
    If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.

    VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI

    I came, I saw, I kicked ass

  30. #30
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Will Tony Blair change his mind?

    Quote Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
    As far as I know, the only current restrictions are that a hereditary peer must relinquish his title (to be able to stand for the Commons) and the Prime Minister cannot be a Roman Catholic.
    Just to pluck this out for a moment, Hereditary Peers.

    Consider, the traditional far to the commons is based on the "one man one vote" principle. Hereditary, and other peers, have the right to sit in the Lords and therefore cannot partake of elections of sit in the Commons.

    Here's the thing, if I lost my seat in the Lords in the reforms I should be able to keep my family title but still vote in elections and sit in the Commons, otherwise you're denying me my human rights.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO