Ah, Hillary's Hypocrisy

**ShadeHonestus** · 03-15-2007, 04:42

Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit

Gotta love someone who lets polls decide their morals.

Better yet, someone who lets polls speak their morals. She won't speak of them herself.

**Beren Son Of Barahi** · 03-15-2007, 05:48

wasn't there something funny about GWB and some high court judges getting him elected in the first place... oh i can't remember..... /sc off

its a tad rich for the republicans to care about the voting system and voter fraud now isn't it....

**Tribesman** · 03-15-2007, 08:47

Though, I never said she fired the attorneys. But I guess it's easier for some to just set up strawmen and hack away.

Ahem

that would be bollox then would it ? or was it another cwazy wabbit who wroted it.?......she and her husband had every single federal attorney fired in 1993.
.......she and her husband had every single federal attorney fired in 1993.

hmmmmm...notice the words she had fired

**ShadeHonestus** · 03-15-2007, 08:50

She was too busy taking vacations with Chelsea at the tax payers expense to have an input...

**Crazed Rabbit** · 03-15-2007, 18:44

Ahem that would be bollox then would it ?

Nope, I said she and her husband had every attorney fired, not that she did it herself. You seem to be forgetting the crucial words 'and her husband'.

"We are the president", remember?

Anyways, here ya go tribesy: http://www.starfall.com/

Crazed Rabbit

**Goofball** · 03-15-2007, 20:05

Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit

Nope, I said she and her husband had every attorney fired, not that she did it herself. You seem to be forgetting the crucial words 'and her husband'.

"We are the president", remember?

Anyways, here ya go tribesy: http://www.starfall.com/

Crazed Rabbit

"May I take this opportunity of emphasizing that there is no cannibalism in the British Navy. Absolutely none, and when I say none, I mean there is a certain amount, more than we are prepared to admit..."

C'mon CR. That is just pure mental midgetry on your part.

Are you saying she had something to do with the firing or not?

Either way, you have no point.

If you are saying she was responsible for the firing, you're wrong, so the premise of your thread dies a quick death.

If you are saying she wasn't responsible for the firing, then what was the point of this thread in the first place?

**ShadeHonestus** · 03-15-2007, 20:23

Originally Posted by Goofball

C'mon CR. That is just pure mental midgetry on your part.

Are you saying she had something to do with the firing or not?

Either way, you have no point.

If you are saying she was responsible for the firing, you're wrong, so the premise of your thread dies a quick death.

If you are saying she wasn't responsible for the firing, then what was the point of this thread in the first place?

There is a problem with this theory and that is the fact she was a very assertive first lady, both when he was governor and president. Is there any real doubt there? In fact many on both sides of the aisle put their marriage as one which was political in nature, not merely a product of fancy. Other, much more quiet first ladies have garnered more attention than you're willing to give the extremely political animal we know and love as Mrs Clinton. She served as the chair of presidential task forces for goodness sake and has a very long list of political involvement, domestic and foreign. To believe that she had zero input, zero influence, zero deciding power is a stance of midgetry. She wasn't at home baking muffins while Bill ran the country...

**Crazed Rabbit** · 03-16-2007, 03:07

Originally Posted by Goofball

If you are saying she was responsible for the firing, you're wrong, so the premise of your thread dies a quick death.

If you are saying she wasn't responsible for the firing, then what was the point of this thread in the first place?

You seem to be assuming that she needs to be fully responsible for those firings to be a hypocrite.

A baseless assumption, in my opinion, as her explanation of the 1993 events and her condemnation of these much less events make her a hypocrite. 'Routine' when her hubby does it, an evil machination for political reasons when Bush does it. Hmmm...

Thats a lot of words Goof , it is easier to just write bollox

For you, I don't doubt it. That's your common response to just about everything - such ingrained habits make an observer wonder if the specimen is capable of producing any other response.

Crazed Rabbit