Ah, Hillary's Hypocrisy

**Goofball** · 03-15-2007, 20:05

Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit

Nope, I said she and her husband had every attorney fired, not that she did it herself. You seem to be forgetting the crucial words 'and her husband'.

"We are the president", remember?

Anyways, here ya go tribesy: http://www.starfall.com/

Crazed Rabbit

"May I take this opportunity of emphasizing that there is no cannibalism in the British Navy. Absolutely none, and when I say none, I mean there is a certain amount, more than we are prepared to admit..."

C'mon CR. That is just pure mental midgetry on your part.

Are you saying she had something to do with the firing or not?

Either way, you have no point.

If you are saying she was responsible for the firing, you're wrong, so the premise of your thread dies a quick death.

If you are saying she wasn't responsible for the firing, then what was the point of this thread in the first place?

**ShadeHonestus** · 03-15-2007, 20:23

Originally Posted by Goofball

C'mon CR. That is just pure mental midgetry on your part.

Are you saying she had something to do with the firing or not?

Either way, you have no point.

If you are saying she was responsible for the firing, you're wrong, so the premise of your thread dies a quick death.

If you are saying she wasn't responsible for the firing, then what was the point of this thread in the first place?

There is a problem with this theory and that is the fact she was a very assertive first lady, both when he was governor and president. Is there any real doubt there? In fact many on both sides of the aisle put their marriage as one which was political in nature, not merely a product of fancy. Other, much more quiet first ladies have garnered more attention than you're willing to give the extremely political animal we know and love as Mrs Clinton. She served as the chair of presidential task forces for goodness sake and has a very long list of political involvement, domestic and foreign. To believe that she had zero input, zero influence, zero deciding power is a stance of midgetry. She wasn't at home baking muffins while Bill ran the country...

**Goofball** · 03-15-2007, 20:31

Originally Posted by ShadeHonestus

There is a problem with this theory and that is the fact she was a very assertive first lady, both when he was governor and president. Is there any real doubt there? In fact many on both sides of the aisle put their marriage as one which was political in nature, not merely a product of fancy. Other, much more quiet first ladies have garnered more attention than you're willing to give the extremely political animal we know and love as Mrs Clinton. She served as the chair of presidential task forces for goodness sake and has a very long list of political involvement, domestic and foreign. To believe that she had zero input, zero influence, zero deciding power is a stance of midgetry. She wasn't at home baking muffins while Bill ran the country...

My wife is very assertive and has a very strong personality. Do you think my clients should be able to blame her if I turn down their loan applications?

Hillary may have had influence, but can ultimately bear no responsibility for any actions of the President. She could harp at Bill all day long, but she was not "the decider."

**ShadeHonestus** · 03-15-2007, 20:48

Originally Posted by Goofball

Hillary may have had influence, but can ultimately bear no responsibility for any actions of the President. She could harp at Bill all day long, but she was not "the decider."

No official responsibility outside of official recommendations she did make throughout the administration while serving in official capacities. Does your wife serve any official capacity at your work? If so and depending on how close to your capacity, she could have culpability.

**Tribesman** · 03-15-2007, 21:17

Are you saying she had something to do with the firing or not?

Either way, you have no point.

If you are saying she was responsible for the firing, you're wrong, so the premise of your thread dies a quick death.

If you are saying she wasn't responsible for the firing, then what was the point of this thread in the first place?

Thats a lot of words Goof , it is easier to just write bollox since that fully sums up Rabbits attempt at making a point

**Crazed Rabbit** · 03-16-2007, 03:07

Originally Posted by Goofball

If you are saying she was responsible for the firing, you're wrong, so the premise of your thread dies a quick death.

If you are saying she wasn't responsible for the firing, then what was the point of this thread in the first place?

You seem to be assuming that she needs to be fully responsible for those firings to be a hypocrite.

A baseless assumption, in my opinion, as her explanation of the 1993 events and her condemnation of these much less events make her a hypocrite. 'Routine' when her hubby does it, an evil machination for political reasons when Bush does it. Hmmm...

Thats a lot of words Goof , it is easier to just write bollox

For you, I don't doubt it. That's your common response to just about everything - such ingrained habits make an observer wonder if the specimen is capable of producing any other response.

Crazed Rabbit

**Tribesman** · 03-16-2007, 08:39

EDIT: Or, to put it another way -

BG

**Fisherking** · 03-16-2007, 09:17

Dose anyone remember what she said about the 1100 FBI files they couldn't find but showed up on her desk?

**ShadeHonestus** · 03-16-2007, 09:27

Originally Posted by Fisherking

Dose anyone remember what she said about the 1100 FBI files they couldn't find but showed up on her desk?

Oh come on, its obviously less tin hatty to think the Saudi royal family controls the American Ruling class through top secret society BBQ's than thinking a politician like her would have anything to do in the white house but fluff the pillows.

I forget which one is more tin hatty, the Saudi control or the beliefs that the Jews control us completely hence our backing of Israel which is the root of all evil in the Middle East.

Maybe Camp David is really a double top secret playground for excellent Arab-Jew relations that is kept under wraps as the conflict is just a farce to control american politics.

But really, Mrs Clinton involved in the administration of her husband (despite all the official positions and well known public assertions of policy) is really a whacky idea.

[edit] I almost forgot

**Fisherking** · 03-16-2007, 09:58

That was not a part of the cookie baking defence now was it?

Which one of them I wonder thought the Commandant of the Marines would look good passing out the canapés? I know Bill asked, but do you think he really has that much of an eye for fashion and style?

**Tribesman** · 03-16-2007, 10:22

EDIT: Or, to put it another way - BG

Aw come on Banquo you know Rabbitte says that is his favourite word in debates when people are talking crap .
If its good enough to describe excrement in the Dail it is certainly good enough for the excrement that is rabbits "point" here .
And lets face it there is no merit whatsoever in rabbits "point" .

**ShadeHonestus** · 03-16-2007, 17:46

Originally Posted by Fisherking

That was not a part of the cookie baking defense now was it?

I think she was too busy, after baking the cookies, in firing those travel office personnel. Remember the clear and substantial evidence against her, yet the congress at the time decided not to prosecute despite the firings being purely political and for personal gain? Damn those republicans and their modicum of decency and perspective.