Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Congress adds billions in pork to war spending bill

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    zombologist Senior Member doc_bean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Riding Shai-Hulud
    Posts
    5,346

    Default Re: Congress adds billions in pork to war spending bill

    Quote Originally Posted by Fisherking
    While you may see it as just agriculture, these industries are controlled by only a few huge agro-corporations. Most agricultural subsidies were eliminated in the late 1990 or in Bush's first term. The ones that remain are not helping individual farmers to any great extent.

    Both parties are likely to help keep these subsidies because they receive money in the form of campaign contributions to do so.

    It is not helping to keep the coast of food low or increase availability, just line the pockets of those who benefit.
    Rural schools ? Monsanto doesn't own those yet, I believe.
    Yes, Iraq is peaceful. Go to sleep now. - Adrian II

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member Fisherking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East of Augusta Vindelicorum
    Posts
    5,575

    Default Re: Congress adds billions in pork to war spending bill

    Quote Originally Posted by doc_bean
    Rural schools ? Monsanto doesn't own those yet, I believe.
    I think I said most of the items were junk, not all. But if it has merit it should be able to stand on its own and need not be tucked into a military spending bill. It isn't like there are no educational expenditures that it could not stand with. Besides, do you really know what it means or its details? Lots of things in these bills say something completely different than what they will actually do and all need to be read not just voted on because it has a nice title.

    Too often (almost always) Congress just votes on the title and never looks any deeper. Therefore almost everything they intact is rubbish.

    There is a need in all governments to pay more attention to what they are doing rather then being complacent and conducting votes because it feels good to vote for some title or other.


    Education: that which reveals to the wise,
    and conceals from the stupid,
    the vast limits of their knowledge.
    Mark Twain

  3. #3
    Master Procrastinator Member TevashSzat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    University of Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,367

    Default Re: Congress adds billions in pork to war spending bill

    Without these addendums to important spending bills or landmark laws, nothing local would get done. It takes Congress forever to get anything done due to all of the partisan feelings down in DC so bills for a congressman's local district will either never make it as a bill or get put on the agenda and get delayed for a year or two
    "I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me." - Issac Newton

  4. #4
    Hand Bacon Member ShadeHonestus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1,167

    Default Re: Congress adds billions in pork to war spending bill

    Quote Originally Posted by Xdeathfire
    Without these addendums to important spending bills or landmark laws, nothing local would get done. It takes Congress forever to get anything done due to all of the partisan feelings down in DC so bills for a congressman's local district will either never make it as a bill or get put on the agenda and get delayed for a year or two

    Well thats a bastardization of it in a way and goes to a person's view of the Feds. The government doesn't have direct authority to fund state/local programs outside the "grant" and above funding via necessary and proper, instertate commerce. In fact almost all national programs are a bastardizing of the Federal Government's role, but one we've come to accept as it gives us pork to buy votes.


    Honestly, who doesn't like bacon?
    "There is a true glory and a true honor; the glory in duty done and the honor in the integrity of principle."

    "The truth is this; the march of Providence so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often only see the ebb of the advancing wave. It is history which teaches us to hope."

  5. #5
    The Black Senior Member Papewaio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    15,677

    Default Re: Congress adds billions in pork to war spending bill

    $74 million for peanut storage costs;
    Most be talented monkeys.

    You could get some decent workers with that money.
    Our genes maybe in the basement but it does not stop us chosing our point of view from the top.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
    Pape for global overlord!!
    Quote Originally Posted by English assassin
    Squid sources report that scientists taste "sort of like chicken"
    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    The rest is either as average as advertised or, in the case of the missionary, disappointing.

  6. #6
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Congress adds billions in pork to war spending bill

    Quote Originally Posted by Xdeathfire
    Without these addendums to important spending bills or landmark laws, nothing local would get done.
    Good. Let local government deal with local matters.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  7. #7
    American since 2012 Senior Member AntiochusIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lalaland
    Posts
    3,125

    Default Re: Congress adds billions in pork to war spending bill

    Will President Bush finds it in his heart to oppose pork spending bills from Congress as an upstanding supporter of Republican fiscal conservatism?

    [/honest question]

  8. #8
    Hope guides me Senior Member Hosakawa Tito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Western New Yuck
    Posts
    7,914

    Default Re: Congress adds billions in pork to war spending bill

    Republican fiscal conservatism is non-existent in this administration.
    Like all Presidents, he is concerned with his legacy now. I feel he's going to be disappointed big time in this regard.
    We could use an Abraham Lincoln right about now.
    "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." *Jim Elliot*

  9. #9
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Congress adds billions in pork to war spending bill

    Quote Originally Posted by Hosakawa Tito
    Republican fiscal conservatism is non-existent in this administration.
    Disappointingly, Bush has never been a fiscal conservative at any point during his time as president. The only "good" he has done fiscally was cutting taxes.
    Like all Presidents, he is concerned with his legacy now. I feel he's going to be disappointed big time in this regard.
    We could use an Abraham Lincoln right about now.
    Legacies won't be determined anytime soon. I'm not arguing his will be great (that remains to be seen), I'm just saying that one's legacy is not determined by contemporary views. It's interesting that you bring up Lincoln, in that he too was widely disliked while in office, yet he's now considered one of our greatest presidents. I'm sure while Lincoln was still in office, people thought his legacy would be horrible.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO