Quote Originally Posted by lobf View Post
Did the "Casse" (I expect a name change, too) actually do this? Is there evidence of them interfering in continental politics?
Yes. Well, Divitiacus was a Belgae king, but he held power in Britain, from which we can deduct that there was interaction between the two regions.

Quote Originally Posted by lobf View Post
That is no justification for a faction. In fact, if there's good naval invasions, it would be a plus to not have a faction, IMO. It will make it a prize to be contested over by the continental powers, and not just a money generating machine for whomever starts there.
Uhm, what? If anything, creation of cash cow regions is a terrible reason not to include a faction.

Even if Britain was not as developed as Gaul, Cassivellaunus had waged war against several other British tribes, so there was effort by tribes to exert control over each other through the use of arms and create hegemony, and not just patronus-cliens-relationships.

Also, has it not been mentioned that all the factions of EBI are going to make it in EBII? (Unless I'm gravely mistaken)