Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
Goofball;
In brief, modern liberalism is the belief that wars, poverty, all bad human stuff, suffering, etc, comes from various parties believing they had the right way to solve problems. The solution, to them, is therefore to assume there is no right way, to assume anyone who says there is a right way is a supporter of human suffering. They also refuse to discriminate - that is, choose logically between different options - meaning no one is better than anyone else (see, perhaps, the Iranian thread).
An example he uses is an extension of kindergarten thought - do not hit becomes never wage war. They do not allow exceptions, basing their view on the cut and dried kindergarten version with bigger words.

I've not done the speaker justice with my brief synopsis, but that's kind of the idea. I would recommend watching it.

Crazed Rabbit
That's where things really fall apart with that definition of liberalism. If that were really true, liberals would implicitly be acknowledging that (for example) the hard core Christian conservative way of doing things was just as good a way of doing things as any other.

See the fallacy there?