Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Beast or Beasts?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Beast or Beasts?

    Link

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Berlin rallies behind baby bear



    Knut the polar bear
    Berlin Zoo has vowed it will not kill a baby polar bear amid a heated row over whether it is right to hand-rear the cub, who was rejected by his mother.
    Knut has been nurtured by a keeper who has slept by his side, bottle-fed him, and strummed him Elvis Presley songs.

    But suggestions the three-month-old should have been put down to stop him becoming emotionally and physically reliant on a human have caused outrage.

    "We are keeping Knut," Berlin zoo's vet told the BBC. "He's staying alive."

    The zoo says Knut should be strong enough to make his first public appearance at the end of this week, having amassed an army of fans who have followed his development - from walking to weaning - in the city's newspapers.

    He has already posed for the world-renowned photographer Annie Leibovitz as part of an environmental campaign, and next week is to be the subject of a documentary series by German broadcaster ARD.

    Letting Knut go

    But ahead of his debut, several voices have questioned the decision to keep him alive after he was rejected by his mother, a 20-year-old former performing bear from East Germany.

    Both Knut and his twin were left exposed to freezing temperatures shortly after they were born in December. Knut's brother died, at which point the zoo intervened to save the surviving cub.

    Each time his keeper leaves him, and he can't follow, he will die a little

    Wolfram Graf-Rudolf
    Aachen Zoo

    "One should have had the courage to let the bear die then," said Wolfram Graf-Rudolf, head of the Aachen Zoo, cited by the Sueddeutsche newspaper.

    The zookeeper, who has watched the hand-rearing of two animals, said Knut will find life intolerable once bars inevitably come between him and his carer.

    "Each time his keeper leaves him, and he can't follow, he will die a little."

    Frank Albrecht, an animal rights campaigner, had started the debate in the mass-circulation Bild newspaper by declaring the zoo was violating animal protection legislation by keeping him alive.

    "If truth be told, the zoo should have killed the baby bear."

    New home

    Animals similarly rejected by their mothers in captivity have in the past been killed. Last December, a baby sloth was put down at Leipzig zoo after his mother refused to care for him.


    Knut has been on his feet since late February

    But each case is individual, argues Andre Schuele, Berlin Zoo's vet, and should be decided on their own merits.

    "Knut was a healthy baby bear when we found him and so there was no reason for us to put him down," he said. "And there's certainly no reason to do so now."

    To help Knut gain independence, he was already being left on his own for a couple of hours each day, and had been weaned off the bottle.

    Polar bears were lonesome creatures, and so spending several years without the company of other bears would not be a problem, said Mr Schuele.

    The cub will however eventually be introduced to others - although not back to his own family in Berlin Zoo.

    "He will go to another zoo," said Mr Schuele. "Eventually, we will find him a new home."


    Seems to me like there is no supporting the position to put the bear down, wouldn't the mother leave him alone for periods not to mention the fact that Polar Bears are mostly solitary animals anyway and eventually the cub would be on its own anyway.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member Ser Clegane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Escaped from the pagodas
    Posts
    6,606

    Default Re: Beast or Beasts?

    The whole discussion about putting this cub down was totally blown out of proportion by the yellow-press he in Germany (especailly by the beloved BILD.
    The animal rights campaigner actually never demanded that the cub should be killed but rather wanted to protest in general against how zoos keep animals.
    He actually protested against the killing is this particular case that is also mentioned in the article:
    Quote Originally Posted by article
    Last December, a baby sloth was put down at Leipzig zoo after his mother refused to care for him.
    He used the new case as an opportunity to get publicity for the whole issue and also to point out how different the standards for such situations appear to be.

    Well, at least the media had a field day and Knut apparently is now not only a ntional celebrity (which he was before this story came up) but also an international one

  3. #3
    Vermonter and Seperatist Member Uesugi Kenshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Mountains.
    Posts
    3,868

    Default Re: Beast or Beasts?

    Well I read about this in the Neues Deutschland yesterday after school. The gist of that article was that the zoo never even planned to put the cudly little Knut down and made the environmentalist look like an idiot. They also quoted the zoo director as saying that there were never any plans to put him down especially since he's an indangered animal and so on. I can't remember any very specific details from the other article, but what're you going to do.

    Oh yeah, Neues Deutschland is a socialist paper so you never know....
    "A man's dying is more his survivor's affair than his own."
    C.S. Lewis

    "So many people tiptoe through life, so carefully, to arrive, safely, at death."
    Jermaine Evans

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO