No one is even voting for you OldSchool![]()
No one is even voting for you OldSchool![]()
I think both Andres and Stig are mafia.
hehehOriginally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Let the detective check me if you want to be sure
My defense is:
I have a social life
And loads of people are bandwagoning, you should search the mafia among them
And about Sasaki:
All he can do is point at me and Andres, he's not being constructive and only saying:
"Stig, you're not on the forums, you should be lynched!"
"Andres, you defend Stig, that makes you mafia!"
1. I have life.
2. Even Andres wouldn't be stupid enough to defend an already dead mafia mate.
3. You don't have any convincing arguments. Kommo does have those. All the others are bandwagoning.
Last edited by Stig; 03-27-2007 at 23:03.
I don't know, Stig seems to be acting a bit unusually to me. I believe what he says about his social life, I seem to recall him using the same excuse this excuse for one of the other games (Can't remember which, so don't ask). But, maybe I am wrong about it.
As to Sasaki, this is just his playing style, so really I don't see anything unusual there.
As for my vote:
Vote: Omanes the Idiot
The reason:
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=208
Until he expands on this, my vote will stand.
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
Well in that case:
Unvote: Omanes
I would still like him to expand on his hunch however.
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
Vote: Roadkill
Reason: You have posted four times, two being votes, and have voted for Sasaki twice with poor reasoning. You also are listening to Omanes, who is dead and probably has a Sasaki grudge, true or not, he is dead and yet you jumped right onto his Sasaki bandwagon. Suspicious, who knows, but I think some attention needs drawn to you.
Also, I believe Sasaki is not mafia. The pieces of the puzzle just don't fit. Then again, I probably have no idea what I am talking about and will probably start another bandwagon on my ass again...
he seemed a bit jumpy to me Sasaki Kojiro.Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
maybe he is trying to hide something![]()
IN Total War I Trust!!
The Foolish Horseman, previously known as GBB
I thought I read that I was in the lead in the bandwagon parade? I had a nice farewell speech all planned out and everything...Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Here you go again Sasaki. Random throwing around of accusations and picking on a new player again. Also you seem to be spamming this thread - is this to cause my accusations and suspicions to be so far back that nobody will read them?Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
When I look at your posts and add up the evidence, all I can see is the word "Guilty" written all over your style.
Last edited by Omanes Alexandrapolites; 03-27-2007 at 21:27.
Dawn is nature's way of telling you to go back to bed
Omanes, you stold the words out of my mouth and I 100% agree with you so
Vote:sasaki
"I thought CA was unarmed? Unless he got some samurai swords or something... I only got some rocks and some sticks." Shlin in BR realizing he has no weapons what so ever.
Same as yesterday huh? What do you think about stig/andres?Originally Posted by RoadKill
Omanes, if that's an accusation then Sasaki's lost his style. He can do much better than that.
He may seem to be spamming this thread, but it's just him being him. He's always either the number two poster, but more frequently the number one poster. Generating discussion is his style, and has always been that way. He, and others mind you, tend to go after the newer players because they have no particular style. We have no idea if this is there usual play style, or their mafioso way to play the game. Hence, reactions in the form of discussion are needed to get to know them better.
So, in each and every game in which Sasaki has played, gathering the 'evidence' would have always led to certain lynch. However, he has exactly the same statistical chance of being selected as mafioso as we do. Don't go after him because he generates discussion - heck, townies should !
In short, don't be worried. He's always like this, and rest assured the Detective has already investigated him. And if he were mafia, the detective would instantly reveal - as the detective vs mafioso trade is a good one.
![]()
Last edited by Dutch_guy; 03-27-2007 at 21:41.
Dutch_Guy, how do you know the Detective already investigated him?
I didn't think the Detective could admit his role, until he chose to reveal.
The Throne Room: "Less a forum, more a way of life." Econ21
Don't hesitate to visit the Mead Hall! A little more reading, a little less shouting, please.
Join the latest greatest installement of mafia games: Capo di Tutti Capi!
Check out the Gahzette!
By the by, are you interested in helping out the Gahzette? Think you could be a writer, reporting on the TW or Org community? Then check the Gahzette Thread or drop me a PM!
Back.
Well, I would have investigated him were I the detective. It is the most prudent strategy in my opinion, as he's proven to be a valuable player in the past. One whom you want to rule out as mafia grunt.Originally Posted by Warmaster Horus
I believe you're right, it isn't allowed -it has never been.I didn't think the Detective could admit his role, until he chose to reveal.
Originally Posted by Me
![]()
Last edited by Dutch_guy; 03-27-2007 at 22:05.
Ok I didn't get to everybody but they can wait.
I believe this is a slip up by andres here. He suggests that on day one Oldschool had chosen to go after lurkers rather than consider potential henchmen; ...Originally Posted by AndresTheCunning
...
hmm no I reread and this is wrong. DOH wasn't referring to potential henchmen thing when talking about the shift in tactics. He was talking about focussing on the andres-motep thing. I retract my previous accusation.
I need to reread on Oldschool and GBB as well.
Ok I think Oldschool is mafia, and possible GBB.
Vote:Oldschool
So. Andres votes Motep before game start. Then mafia kill motep. Maybe this was random maybe not. But blackaxe mentions it and the hunt goes around, perhaps this gets the mafia thinking. That night they again kill who Andres voted for (hughtower). Then we get this series of posts:
I said I didn't understand the connection and he eventually says:Originally Posted by Oldschool
This belies his last post where he was speaking as if the connection was a given and pondering whether it implicated Andres. This alone is enough for my vote.Originally Posted by Oldschool
Next:
The kills "just happen" to implicate Andres...not because Andres is mafia mind you, but because the mafia are framing him! How the hell did I miss this yesterday.Originally Posted by Oldschool
He assumes he's about to be lynched![]()
It's weird. But I mention it because of GBB's next posts:If you're going to lynch me, I'll try to make my point one last time before I hang and then I'll shut-up about it.
Very interesting, which leads me to wonder if this next bit was a bit of distancing:OldSchool definatley also has a valid point here. The connection between AndresTheCunning's votes and the deaths is all to continous to be a coincidence. Therefore
Unvote: Kommodus
Vote: AndresThecunning
Originally Posted by GBB
Oldschool is the lynch for today.
Not funny
I can only guess who did this.![]()
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Nice one, Sasaki.![]()
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur
Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Well, how about that. Round three and we are still discussing the Andres connection. It's almost like somebody warned us that would happen.Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Andres voted against Motep before the killings.
The following things were almost inevitable:
1) Motep would be one of the first kills.
2) Somebody would notice the connection and vote Andres.
3) Somebody else would point out the bad logic of that.
4) Andres would most likely be safe from an early-round bandwagon because the evidence had been dismissed.
I tried to consider if Andres would do it on purpose in order to achieve those results or if it was a half-hearted attempt to frame him. I didn't come to enough of a conclusion to cast a vote, although I leaned towards him doing it on purpose.
When I read back through the thread, I noticed that Andres also voted HughTower. I knew as soon as he voted someone and they didn't die, that person would immediately fall under suspicion. Now, he could not only be used as a distraction, but could also be used to channel suspicion. I felt it was best for us to lynch him and I tried to convince you guys of that.
When I first mentioned Andres, it was in a post where I was trying to chime in on the things that had gone on in the round before. Andres was just one of those things, and not the most important in my opinion.
I find your collection of evidence somewhat selective, Sasaki. You are the one who latched onto my initial Andres comment. For someone looking for discussion, you didn't seem at all interested in any other topic with me. You are the one who kept spinning the merry-go-round and inspired me to dig deeper into it.
Clearly I came to my conclusion as the conversation went along, but you have presented it here as if I had some kind of master plan all along. I explained why I thought I was about to be lynched, but somehow that hasn't been included in your accusation, either.
Out of everybody, you are the one most responsible for returning the subject back to Andres. With BlackAxe in the first round. With me in the second round. And now yet again.
That is all the Andres merry-go-round I'm riding on for you. Lynch me or don't. I still say the best thing we can do is remove Andres as a suspect or a distraction.
vote: AndrestheCunning
OldSchool, if I am abused as a distraction, I don't see why you should lynch me for that? An abused townie is still a townie and I don't understand how lynching a townie will help us win this game. The mafia picks me as a distraction and you conclude that I should get lynched because of that? So basically you are saying that the town should lynch the player selected by the mafia? And if you lynch me and next round they use somebody else as a distraction, do you want us to lynch that townie as well? I don't understand the logic and to me it seems like you are distracting the town by trying to convince us to lynch annoying townies instead of mafiosi.
Besides, I voted you last round and you are still alive right now, so I guess a) the mafia has quit "abusing" me b) you are mafia.
So, for the reasons I stated right now and in the previous round, I will:
Vote : OldSchool
Call it a bandwagon or anything else you like, I gave my reasoning in the
previous round and it is still valid now.
I think we've heard OldSchool's continuous mantra long enough for now.
OOC: The lack of posting by other players is disturbing me...
Last edited by Andres; 03-29-2007 at 08:38.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
I don't think he was picking on me Omanes. I was reading backwards through the thread and saw a post stating I was leading the lynch vote. I never bothered to count the votes. So my opinion that I was about to be lynched did not jive with the vote count and causedOriginally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites the Idiot
.
I asked him a question as indicated by the ???. Oldschool doesn't seem to be new. I always post a alot.Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites the Idiot
Bookmarks